Trump Admin Accused of Defying Court Order on Head Start Grants

ACLU files new court motion alleging administration is ignoring judge's injunction on diversity policies.

Feb. 3, 2026 at 10:07pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The American Civil Liberties Union has accused the Trump administration of disregarding a federal judge's order to stop requiring Head Start programs to certify they do not have diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. The ACLU argues the administration is continuing to enforce the policy despite the judge's preliminary injunction.

Why it matters

This case highlights ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary, with accusations that the administration routinely ignores or only selectively follows court orders. It also touches on the broader political debate around diversity initiatives in government and federally-funded programs.

The details

A federal judge in Seattle issued a preliminary injunction putting the Trump administration's policy requiring Head Start programs to certify they do not have diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEIA) policies on hold pending further review. However, the ACLU claims the administration is continuing to enforce the DEIA ban, causing confusion and disruption for Head Start agencies.

  • On February 4, 2026, the ACLU filed a new court motion alleging the Trump administration's noncompliance with the judge's order.

The players

American Civil Liberties Union

A non-profit organization dedicated to defending civil rights and civil liberties in the United States.

Trump Administration

The federal executive branch under the leadership of former President Donald Trump.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The judge will likely need to issue a new order explicitly enforcing the previous preliminary injunction and requiring the Trump administration to comply.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing tensions between the executive branch and the judiciary, with the Trump administration accused of routinely ignoring or only selectively following court orders, raising concerns about the rule of law and separation of powers.