- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Washington Governor Signs Law Restricting Police Use of License Plate Data
New guardrails limit when automated license plate readers can be used and how long data can be retained.
Mar. 31, 2026 at 6:57pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
New state regulations aim to balance public safety needs with privacy concerns over the growing use of automated license plate readers by local police.Olympia TodayWashington Governor Bob Ferguson has signed into law new regulations on the use of automated license plate readers by police. The law restricts when the technology can be used, limits data retention to 21 days, and prohibits sharing the data for immigration enforcement or tracking protected activities like free speech. The legislation responds to concerns about federal agencies accessing the data without permission.
Why it matters
The use of automated license plate readers has raised privacy concerns, with fears the data could be misused for purposes like tracking women who have had abortions or aiding immigration enforcement. This new law aims to balance public safety needs with civil liberties protections.
The details
Under the new law, police can only use license plate readers when investigating felonies, gross misdemeanors, searching for stolen vehicles or those with arrest warrants, or looking for missing or endangered people. The data cannot be shared except for court proceedings and must be deleted after 21 days, unless needed for evidence. The law also prohibits using the readers for immigration enforcement or tracking protected activities like free speech, and bans their use near sensitive locations like schools, courts, and places of worship.
- Governor Ferguson signed the law on March 31, 2026.
- The law takes effect immediately.
- By July 1, 2027, the state attorney general's office must develop model policies on the use of automated license plate readers.
The players
Bob Ferguson
The Democratic governor of Washington who signed the new law.
Senate Bill 6002
The legislation that establishes new regulations on the use of automated license plate readers by police in Washington.
Tee Sannon
The technology policy program director for the Washington chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, who expressed disappointment in the final version of the law.
Yasmin Trudeau
The Democratic state senator who sponsored the license plate reader legislation, calling it 'the strongest bill in the country' while acknowledging more work may be needed.
Flock
The company that provides automated license plate reader technology to many police departments in Washington, and says it is working to help agencies comply with the new law.
What they’re saying
“This is obviously a huge issue in our state.”
— Bob Ferguson, Governor of Washington
“Washingtonians deserve policies that prioritize community concerns and needs, but this bill does not provide meaningful protections for peoples' privacy.”
— Tee Sannon, Technology Policy Program Director, ACLU of Washington
“This is the floor, not the ceiling.”
— Yasmin Trudeau, State Senator
What’s next
By July 1, 2027, the Washington state attorney general's office must develop model policies on the use of automated license plate readers.
The takeaway
This new law aims to strike a balance between public safety needs and civil liberties protections, limiting when police can use license plate reader technology and how long they can retain the data. However, some advocates believe the final version still does not go far enough in safeguarding privacy rights.


