Washington Senate Passes Bill Banning Masked Law Enforcement Amid ICE Activity

The proposed legislation aims to prohibit all law enforcement from wearing masks during interactions with the public.

Jan. 29, 2026 at 9:47pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Washington State Senate has advanced a proposal that would prohibit all law enforcement, including federal immigration agents, from wearing masks while interacting with the public. The bill, SB 5855, is part of a broader effort by state Democrats to impede federal immigration enforcement and address concerns about the tactics used by agents, particularly U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The measure has sparked debate, with Republicans arguing that the mask ban is unenforceable and that the state should focus on the "real issues" created by the Biden administration's immigration policies.

Why it matters

The proposed mask ban on law enforcement is part of a larger political battle between Washington state and the federal government over immigration enforcement. The state's Democratic leadership has introduced several bills that could hinder ICE operations, while Republicans have argued that the state is overstepping its authority. The mask ban is seen as a way to address concerns about the anonymity and perceived aggression of federal agents, but its enforceability and constitutionality remain in question.

The details

Senate Bill 5855 would prohibit all state, federal, and tribal law enforcement officers from wearing masks while interacting with the public. This would technically apply to ICE agents as well, though there is debate over whether the Trump administration would comply. The bill was passed by the state Senate in a 30-19 vote, with all Republicans opposing the measure. Supporters argue that the mask ban is necessary to address the "fear and trauma" caused by unidentified federal agents, while opponents contend that the masks are needed to protect officers from harassment and doxxing.

  • The Washington State Senate advanced the proposal on Wednesday, January 29, 2026.
  • The state House held a public hearing on a companion bill on January 12, 2026, but ultimately decided to hold off on passing it out of committee.

The players

Bob Ferguson

The governor of Washington state who announced his support for the mask ban earlier this month.

Phil Portunato

A Republican state senator from Auburn who testified against the mask ban, arguing that federal agents wear masks to protect themselves and their families.

Javier Valdez

A Democratic state senator from Seattle who spoke out against the presence of "armed unidentified agents" in public spaces, saying they are "spreading fear" and "terrorizing" communities.

John Braun

The Senate Minority Leader, who argued that the mask ban is "not enforceable" and that the state should instead "focus on the real issues put in place by the Biden administration."

Adrian Cortes

A Democratic state senator from Battle Ground who testified that a video showed a federal agent shooting a person who was "helping a young woman who was pushed down by masked agents."

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“They're not wearing masks because they're secret police. They're wearing masks to protect themselves and their family.”

— Phil Portunato, State Senator

“When armed unidentified agents see people in public spaces, they're not enforcing the law; they're spreading fear. Communities are being traumatized, families are being terrorized, and our trust in our public institutions become eroded.”

— Javier Valdez, State Senator

“Video clearly showed that he was helping a young woman who was pushed down by masked agents that were not identified. He was beaten, and then an ICE agent stood over his back, clear as day and shot him in the back.”

— Adrian Cortes, State Senator

What’s next

The bill now moves to the state House, where lawmakers will consider any amendments before the final adoption of the legislation.

The takeaway

The debate over the mask ban on law enforcement in Washington state highlights the ongoing tensions between the state and federal government over immigration enforcement. While supporters argue the measure is necessary to address community concerns, opponents contend it is an unconstitutional overreach that distracts from the real issues surrounding the Biden administration's immigration policies.