- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Arlington Today
By the People, for the People
Democratic Senators Demand Answers from Defense Secretary Hegseth Over Alleged Investment Inquiry
Lawmakers raise concerns over potential conflict of interest ahead of Iran war
Apr. 2, 2026 at 6:24pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A group of Senate Democrats are demanding more information about Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's finances and investments following a report that he may have tried to invest in defense stocks before the war in Iran began roughly five weeks ago. The senators say if the report is accurate, it would represent a 'profound conflict of interest' and a 'betrayal of the nation' paying the price for the war.
Why it matters
The allegations against Hegseth, if true, would raise serious ethical concerns about a top government official potentially trying to profit off of insider knowledge of impending military action. This could undermine public trust in the Pentagon's leadership and decision-making during a time of war.
The details
The Financial Times reported that a broker for Hegseth at Morgan Stanley contacted BlackRock, an equity fund, and tried to make a multimillion-dollar investment into a fund with defense stocks weeks before the Iran war began. The investment did not go through because it was not yet available for Morgan Stanley clients. The Pentagon has dismissed the report as 'entirely false and fabricated', but the senators are demanding answers from Hegseth about his potential involvement.
- The Financial Times report was published earlier this week.
- The Iran war began roughly five weeks ago.
The players
Pete Hegseth
The current Secretary of Defense, who is accused of potentially trying to invest in defense stocks ahead of the Iran war.
Elizabeth Warren
A Democratic senator who is leading the group demanding answers from Hegseth.
Richard Blumenthal
A Democratic senator who is part of the group demanding answers from Hegseth.
Tammy Duckworth
A Democratic senator who is part of the group demanding answers from Hegseth.
Jeff Merkley
A Democratic senator who is part of the group demanding answers from Hegseth.
Gary Peters
A Democratic senator who is part of the group demanding answers from Hegseth.
What they’re saying
“If this report is accurate, it would appear to represent an appalling effort to profit off of your knowledge of the President's plans for war. This would be a profound conflict of interest and a potential violation of your federal ethics agreement — and betrayal of the nation paying the price for this war and the troops you are sending into harm's way.”
— Elizabeth Warren, Richard Blumenthal, Tammy Duckworth, Jeff Merkley and Gary Peters, Democratic Senators
What’s next
The senators have asked Hegseth to respond to a number of questions about the Financial Times report, including whether he shared any information with his broker about pending military action or directed his broker to invest in any defense-related funds ahead of the Iran war. They have also requested an accounting of defense stocks owned and sold by Hegseth and his wife.
The takeaway
The allegations against Hegseth, if true, would represent a serious breach of the public's trust and raise concerns about potential conflicts of interest at the highest levels of the Pentagon during a time of war. The senators' investigation will aim to determine if there are gaps in current department practices and policies to prevent such conflicts of interest.
