WA Public Records Bill Narrows Focus to School Districts

Lawmakers amend bill to remove task force, concentrate only on school records requests

Feb. 6, 2026 at 10:55pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A Washington bill concerning public records requests has advanced out of committee, but not before lawmakers amended it to remove a proposed task force and narrow the scope to just school districts. The original bill would have created a temporary task force to examine the impact of 'frivolous, retaliatory, or harassing' public records requests on state and local agencies. However, the substitute bill now directs the Joint Legislative Audit & Review Commission to investigate the issue and report back to the governor and state Legislature, with a focus solely on school districts.

Why it matters

The Washington Coalition for Open Government has not taken a stance on the current version of the bill, but has expressed concerns that restricting access to public records 'won't solve the problem' and would 'deny more of us access to public records, increasing secrecy and reducing accountability.' The bill's attempt to address 'frivolous, retaliatory, or harassing' records requests also raises questions about who gets to decide what qualifies.

The details

The original House Bill 2661, sponsored by Rep. Skyler Rude, R-Walla Walla, would have created a temporary task force to examine the impact of 'frivolous, retaliatory, or harassing' public records requests. However, the substitute bill proposed by Rep. Jim Walsh, R-Aberdeen, and advanced out of the House State Government & Tribal Relations committee on Feb. 4, removed the task force and instead directed the Joint Legislative Audit & Review Commission to investigate the issue and report back. The bill also narrowed the focus to school districts only.

  • The original bill was sponsored by Rep. Skyler Rude, R-Walla Walla.
  • The substitute bill was proposed by Rep. Jim Walsh, R-Aberdeen, and advanced out of committee on Feb. 4, 2026.

The players

Rep. Skyler Rude

A Republican state representative from Walla Walla, Washington who sponsored the original version of the public records bill.

Rep. Jim Walsh

A Republican state representative from Aberdeen, Washington who proposed the substitute version of the public records bill that advanced out of committee.

Washington Coalition for Open Government

A nonpartisan organization that advocates for transparency and open government in Washington state.

George Erb

The secretary of the Washington Coalition for Open Government, who expressed concerns about the bill's attempt to limit access to public records.

Tyna Ek

The general counsel for the Washington Schools Risk Management Pool, who testified in favor of the bill.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Too often the state Legislature's response to real or perceived problems with the Public Records Act is to limit access.”

— George Erb, Secretary, Washington Coalition for Open Government

“We contend that Washington state's records-request system is badly in need of repair. But restricting access to records won't solve the problem. Doing so would deny more of us access to public records, increasing secrecy and reducing accountability.”

— George Erb, Secretary, Washington Coalition for Open Government

“Our risk pool is a public risk pool. Instead of buying insurance the school districts pool their resources and create a public organization to handle their litigation. If they just bought insurance instead of self-insurance, they couldn't get this information from an insurance company.”

— Tyna Ek, General Counsel, Washington Schools Risk Management Pool

What’s next

The Joint Legislative Audit & Review Commission will investigate the issue of 'frivolous, retaliatory, or harassing' public records requests and their impact on school districts, and report back to the governor and state Legislature.

The takeaway

This bill highlights the ongoing tension between transparency and efficiency in public records requests, with advocates arguing that limiting access is not the solution, while some school districts seek ways to manage the burden of responding to requests. The final outcome will shape the balance between open government and administrative concerns in Washington state.