Vermont Town Meetings Debate Weighing in on World Issues

Some residents question whether annual local gatherings should consider advisory petitions on state, national or global matters.

Published on Feb. 8, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Vermonters have long used their annual Town Meetings to weigh in on a range of state, national and global issues, from nuclear disarmament to genetically modified foods. But the practice has sparked debate, with some residents arguing these meetings should focus solely on local matters while others defend the tradition of using the gatherings to take moral stands on wider concerns.

Why it matters

Vermont's Town Meetings have a history of bringing national and global issues to the forefront, sometimes leading to real policy changes. However, the practice has also faced criticism from those who believe the meetings should stay focused on local concerns. The debate highlights the tension between using these community gatherings as a platform for broader activism versus keeping them centered on municipal business.

The details

In the town of Newfane, residents have debated issues ranging from the Israeli-Hamas conflict to impeaching former President George W. Bush. Supporters argue these discussions allow communities to take moral stands, while critics say the meetings should prioritize reviewing local budgets and services. Across Vermont, some towns are considering whether to ask the state legislature to advance a universal healthcare bill, while others have rejected citizen petitions on topics like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

  • Vermont's annual Town Meetings typically take place each March.
  • In 1982, more than two-thirds of Vermont's municipalities considered a call for the U.S. to propose a nuclear arms freeze with the Soviet Union.
  • In the 2000s, Town Meeting discussions on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) led to Vermont passing the nation's first seed-labeling and food-labeling laws.

The players

Dan DeWalt

An artisan, activist and former Newfane selectboard member who has proposed advisory petitions on issues like impeaching former President George W. Bush.

Cristine White

A Newfane resident who has criticized the amount of time spent discussing global issues at Town Meetings versus reviewing the local budget.

Jack Mayer

A retired Middlebury physician who has written in support of a Town Meeting resolution encouraging the Vermont Legislature to advance a universal healthcare bill.

Vermont Legislature

The state government body that has the power to consider and act on policy proposals originating from Town Meetings.

Burlington City Council

The governing body of Vermont's largest city, which recently rejected a citizen request to hold a public vote on an "apartheid-free community" pledge.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“When Vermont Town Meetings speak, the nation and the world listens.”

— Dan DeWalt, Resident of Newfane (vtdigger.org)

“Reality check: I doubt very much that any decision in Washington, D.C., is predicated on a vote at Newfane's Town Meeting.”

— Cristine White, Newfane resident (vtdigger.org)

“H.433 has stalled in the House Health Committee, and our resolution will encourage legislators to move it onto the floor for debate and consideration.”

— Jack Mayer, Retired Middlebury physician (vtdigger.org)

What’s next

The Vermont Legislature will consider whether to advance a universal healthcare bill after receiving resolutions from several town meetings across the state.

The takeaway

Vermont's tradition of using Town Meetings to weigh in on state, national and global issues reflects the state's history of grassroots activism and a desire to take moral stands on wider concerns. However, the practice has also faced criticism from those who believe the meetings should stay focused on local matters, highlighting the ongoing debate over the appropriate scope of these community gatherings.