Virginia Redistricting Battle Heads to State Supreme Court

Democrats' proposed congressional map could flip four U.S. House seats, but faces legal challenges from Republicans.

Published on Feb. 20, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Virginia Democrats have passed a proposed congressional redistricting map through the state's General Assembly, but the battle has moved to the Supreme Court of Virginia. A Tazewell County judge granted a temporary restraining order requested by the Republican National Committee, blocking a statewide voter referendum on the new maps scheduled for April 21. Democrats have appealed the ruling to the state Supreme Court, which will determine whether the referendum can proceed.

Why it matters

The outcome of the redistricting battle in Virginia could have significant political consequences, potentially flipping four U.S. House seats in favor of Democrats. The case highlights the broader national strategy around redistricting as both parties seek to gain an advantage in future elections.

The details

The proposed Democratic map would redraw district boundaries in a way that could benefit the party. However, Republicans argue the move violates the state constitution and takes away the voices of rural voters. 6th District Republican Congressman Ben Cline, whose seat is among four that could be affected, says the map splits communities across the region and destroys 'communities of interest' like the Shenandoah Valley.

  • On February 20, 2026, Virginia Democrats passed the proposed congressional map through the General Assembly.
  • On February 19, 2026, a Tazewell County judge granted a temporary restraining order requested by the Republican National Committee, blocking a statewide voter referendum on the new maps scheduled for April 21.
  • The state Supreme Court is already hearing an appeal from a previous lawsuit against redistricting, but has allowed the referendum to proceed.

The players

Virginia Democrats

The Democratic party in Virginia that passed the proposed congressional redistricting map through the state's General Assembly.

Republican National Committee

The national organization of the Republican Party that requested the temporary restraining order to block the statewide voter referendum on the new maps.

Ben Cline

A Republican Congressman representing Virginia's 6th Congressional District, whose seat is among four that could be affected by the proposed redistricting map.

Cayce Myers

A political communications expert at Virginia Tech who provided analysis on the redistricting battle and the potential political consequences.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Virginia needs to be focused on Virginians and not on what other politicians do in Texas. Texas didn't have it written in its constitution. We respect nonpartisan redistricting so much that we put it in our state constitution.”

— Ben Cline, 6th District Republican Congressman (WDBJ7)

“Politicians should not be choosing their voters by drawing gerrymandered maps. The voters should be choosing their politicians in fair elections.”

— Ben Cline, 6th District Republican Congressman (WDBJ7)

“The appeal is not going to come down to these political questions around what do these districts really look like or who's advantaged. It's going to be a process appeal. And has the process been followed or not? That's a very legalistic determination with obvious political consequences and controversy.”

— Cayce Myers, Virginia Tech political communications expert (WDBJ7)

What’s next

The state Supreme Court will determine whether the statewide voter referendum on the new redistricting maps can proceed. If the referendum is allowed to go forward, it could have significant political consequences regardless of the outcome.

The takeaway

The redistricting battle in Virginia highlights the broader national strategy around gerrymandering, with both parties seeking to gain an advantage in future elections. The state's unique requirement for a statewide referendum on redistricting maps adds an extra layer of complexity to the process, with the Supreme Court's decision on the referendum's legality set to have major political implications.