Virginia Judge Blocks Democrats' Redistricting Referendum

Ruling is a setback for party's effort to gain 4 more U.S. House seats in national redistricting battle.

Published on Mar. 1, 2026

A Virginia court has effectively blocked Democrats' planned April voter referendum to redraw the state's congressional maps, granting a temporary restraining order requested by the Republican National Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee. The ruling is a potential blow to the party's effort to pick up four more U.S. House seats in the national redistricting battle.

Why it matters

The court's decision could kill the referendum for this year if it withstands appeal, impacting the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives. Redistricting has become a major political battleground, with both parties jockeying to gain an advantage through the redrawing of district maps.

The details

The Republican request for a restraining order argued that Democrats were rushing the redistricting process despite legal hurdles. This is the second time the Tazewell Circuit Court has ruled against Democrats' redistricting agenda, after an earlier decision that a constitutional amendment resolution was illegally passed. Democrats had been confident in pressing ahead with their effort, releasing a proposed map that could give their party four more seats in the U.S. House.

  • On Thursday, the Tazewell Circuit Court granted a temporary restraining order blocking the referendum.
  • The restraining order is in effect until March 18, with early voting slated to start on March 6.

The players

Jay Jones

Virginia Democratic Attorney General who has vowed to appeal the ruling.

Jack Hurley Jr.

Tazewell Circuit Court Judge who granted the temporary restraining order.

Republican National Committee

One of the plaintiffs that requested the restraining order, along with the National Republican Congressional Committee.

Ben Cline

Republican U.S. Representative who signed the request for the restraining order.

Morgan Griffith

Republican U.S. Representative who signed the request for the restraining order.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The Virginia Supreme Court is reviewing an appeal of the earlier ruling that a constitutional amendment resolution was illegally passed. The court had said it would allow the referendum to proceed while it reviews the appeal.

The takeaway

The court's decision is a setback for Democrats' efforts to gain more U.S. House seats through redistricting in Virginia, underscoring the high-stakes political battle over the redrawing of congressional district maps nationwide.