Virginia Senate Committee Advances Gun Control Bills, Rejects Mandatory Minimum Proposal

Lawmakers approve measures on assault weapons and home storage, but vote down bill to increase mandatory minimum sentences.

Jan. 29, 2026 at 4:07pm

The Virginia Senate committee has advanced several gun control bills, including measures to make it a misdemeanor to own or transport assault weapons and require safe storage of guns in homes. However, the committee rejected a proposal to raise mandatory minimum sentences for using firearms during certain felonies.

Why it matters

This legislative action reflects an ongoing debate in Virginia over balancing public safety concerns with Second Amendment rights. The approved bills aim to restrict access to assault-style weapons, while the rejected proposal would have imposed harsher penalties on firearm-related crimes.

The details

The committee approved a bill that would make it a Class 1 misdemeanor to import, sell, manufacture, buy, own, or transport an assault firearm. Other approved measures focus on regulating the presence of assault weapons in public spaces and requiring safe storage of guns in homes. However, the committee voted down a bill that would have raised the mandatory minimum sentence for using or displaying a firearm during the commission of certain felonies.

  • The Virginia Senate committee meeting took place on January 29, 2026.

The players

Virginia Senate Committee

The legislative committee in the Virginia Senate that considered and voted on the gun control bills.

Senator Danny Diggs

A Republican state senator who sponsored the bill to increase mandatory minimum sentences for firearm-related crimes.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The approved gun control bills will now move forward in the legislative process, while the rejected mandatory minimum proposal will not be considered further.

The takeaway

This vote reflects the ongoing debate in Virginia over balancing public safety concerns and gun rights. The approved measures aim to restrict access to assault weapons, while the rejected proposal would have imposed harsher penalties on firearm-related crimes.