Probe Reveals Alleged Seller of Gun Used in ODU Shooting Had Prior Illegal Sales

Investigators say the individual had previously come under scrutiny but the case was not prosecuted by the DOJ.

Mar. 14, 2026 at 4:32am

New details have emerged in the investigation into the deadly shooting at Old Dominion University, including questions about the firearm used in the attack and the person who allegedly sold it. According to reporting, the gun seller connected to the weapon had a prior history of illegal firearm sales, but the case was not prosecuted by the U.S. Department of Justice.

Why it matters

The revelation has sparked renewed debate over federal enforcement of gun trafficking and illegal firearm sales, particularly in cases where suspects have been previously investigated. Critics argue the case highlights potential gaps in federal gun enforcement, while others caution that decisions not to prosecute can depend on the strength of available evidence and legal standards.

The details

Investigators say the individual had previously come under scrutiny for selling firearms in ways that may have violated federal law. Despite that history, the case was reportedly declined for prosecution, meaning federal charges were not pursued. The shooting at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, left a retired military officer dead after a gunman entered an ROTC classroom and opened fire. Authorities later identified the suspect as Mohamed Bailor Jalloh, a former National Guardsman previously linked to an ISIS-related case.

  • The shooting at Old Dominion University occurred on March 13, 2026.

The players

Mohamed Bailor Jalloh

The suspect in the ODU shooting, a former National Guardsman previously linked to an ISIS-related case.

U.S. Department of Justice

The federal agency that reportedly declined to prosecute the case against the alleged gun seller connected to the weapon used in the ODU shooting.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

Investigators continue piecing together how the suspect obtained the weapon used in the attack, and attention has turned to the alleged seller and the earlier decision not to pursue charges.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing debate over federal enforcement of gun trafficking and illegal firearm sales, particularly in instances where suspects have been previously investigated but not prosecuted.