GOP Lawmakers Propose Stripping Citizenship from Naturalized Terrorists

Legislation would allow denaturalization and deportation of naturalized citizens involved in terrorism

Mar. 14, 2026 at 5:34am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Republican lawmakers, including Rep. Riley Moore, R-W.Va., Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, and Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla., have announced plans to introduce legislation that would allow the U.S. government to denaturalize and deport naturalized citizens who commit or support acts of terrorism. This comes after a recent string of attacks involving immigrants who obtained U.S. citizenship.

Why it matters

The proposed legislation is a response to a perceived 'horrific pattern' of naturalized citizens committing acts of terror against Americans. Supporters argue it is necessary to address this threat, while critics may raise concerns about due process and civil liberties.

The details

The bill would expand the government's ability to revoke citizenship from naturalized individuals who engage in terrorism, commit fraud, espionage or felonies within 10 years of becoming a citizen. This is a departure from current laws, which only allow denaturalization in very limited circumstances, such as when citizenship was obtained through fraud.

  • On March 14, 2026, Rep. Riley Moore announced plans to introduce the legislation.
  • Earlier this week, several attacks allegedly involving naturalized citizens occurred, including incidents in Michigan, Virginia, and New York.

The players

Rep. Riley Moore

A Republican Congressman from West Virginia who announced plans to introduce the legislation.

Rep. Brandon Gill

A Republican Congressman from Texas who vowed to support the bill.

Rep. Randy Fine

A Republican Congressman from Florida who also vowed to support the bill.

Sen. Eric Schmitt

A Republican Senator from Missouri who renewed calls to pass the Stop Citizenship Abuse and Misrepresentation (SCAM) Act, which would expand grounds for denaturalization.

Rep. Tom Emmer

The Republican Majority Whip in the House who introduced the SCAM Act in January.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)

“Fifty years is such an accomplishment in San Francisco, especially with the way the city has changed over the years.”

— Gordon Edgar, grocery employee (Instagram)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.