- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Virginia Localities Seek to Delay Redistricting Amendment Vote
Local governments cite 90-day law in moves to halt early voting on proposed constitutional change
Published on Feb. 24, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Local governments across Virginia are moving to delay early voting on a proposed redistricting constitutional amendment, citing a state law that requires amendments to appear on the ballot no sooner than 90 days after final legislative approval. Several counties have passed resolutions opposing the redistricting, while the City of Lynchburg plans to seek a declaratory judgment from the circuit court. The legal authority of local governments to halt early voting remains unclear as the Virginia Supreme Court has not yet ruled on the legality of the amendment process.
Why it matters
The proposed redistricting amendment has sparked controversy, with three separate lawsuits filed challenging the legality of the process and the wording of the ballot question. The outcome could have significant implications for the state's political landscape, leading local officials to take action to delay the vote.
The details
Local governments in Virginia, including Patrick, Pittsylvania, and Campbell counties, have passed resolutions to halt early voting on the redistricting amendment until the 90-day period has elapsed. The issue is also on the agenda for the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and was discussed by the Lynchburg City Council, which decided to submit a declaratory judgment to the circuit court to seek advice on how to proceed as a city.
- The Virginia law requires amendments to appear on the ballot no sooner than 90 days after final legislative approval.
- The Virginia Supreme Court has not yet ruled on the legality of the amendment process, but has said the vote can move forward.
The players
Patrick County
A county in Virginia that has passed a resolution to halt early voting on the redistricting amendment until the 90-day period has elapsed.
Pittsylvania County
A county in Virginia that has passed a resolution opposing the redistricting amendment.
Campbell County
A county in Virginia that has passed a resolution opposing the redistricting amendment.
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
The governing body of Roanoke County, Virginia, which is set to discuss the redistricting amendment issue.
Lynchburg City Council
The governing body of Lynchburg, Virginia, which discussed the redistricting amendment issue and decided to submit a declaratory judgment to the circuit court.
What they’re saying
“This is uncharted territory. Can they instruct them in what they can do in their jobs? And then big picture, will that be enforced? Will the Virginia Supreme Court say look we're going to let the voting go forward? The localities can't stop it right now. This is a good legal issue, but we're just not going to decide it now.”
— John Fishwick, Former U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Virginia (WSET)
What’s next
The Virginia Supreme Court is expected to rule on the pending lawsuits challenging the legality of the redistricting amendment process and determine whether local governments have the authority to prevent registrars from starting early voting.
The takeaway
The ongoing dispute over the redistricting amendment highlights the complex legal and political issues surrounding the redrawing of electoral districts in Virginia. The outcome could have significant implications for the state's political landscape, leading local officials to take action to delay the vote despite the uncertain legal authority to do so.


