Dissatisfied Loan Applicant's Lawsuit Against Bank of America Dismissed

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A man who sued Bank of America after his loan application was denied had his lawsuit dismissed by the court. Thomas Bowling had submitted a loan application for an auto loan, but Bank of America denied it due to his prior financial issues. Bowling then filed a complaint against the bank alleging breach of fiduciary duty, embezzlement, and commercial dishonor, as well as mishandling of his Social Security number. However, the court found that Bowling's complaint failed to include any specific facts to support these claims and merely listed a 'laundry list' of federal laws without explaining how they were violated. The court ruled that Bowling's complaint did not meet the pleading requirements under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) and granted the bank's motion to dismiss.

Why it matters

This case highlights the importance of meeting the basic pleading requirements in a lawsuit, even against a large financial institution like Bank of America. The court made clear that a plaintiff cannot simply make broad, unsupported allegations and expect the case to proceed. Plaintiffs must provide specific facts to back up their claims in order to give the defendant fair notice of the grounds for the lawsuit.

The details

Thomas Bowling submitted a loan application for an auto loan with Bank of America. Along with the application, he also requested a Power of Attorney and sent a 'tender' to the bank's chief financial officer. Bank of America denied Bowling's loan application due to his prior financial issues, including a foreclosure or repossession, lien or judgment charge-offs, several major derogatory accounts, and recent major derogatory ratios. After receiving the denial, Bowling sent several 'follow-ups' which he claims were ignored. He then filed a complaint against Bank of America alleging breach of fiduciary duty, embezzlement, commercial dishonor, and mishandling of his Social Security number. Bowling also filed a 'brief in support of complaint' that included a list of federal laws and regulations and seven additional causes of action. Bank of America filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that Bowling's complaint failed to meet the pleading requirements of Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

• Bowling submitted a loan application to Bank of America.
• Bank of America denied Bowling's loan application.
• Bowling sent several 'follow-ups' to Bank of America after the denial.
• Bowling filed a complaint against Bank of America.
• Bank of America filed a motion to dismiss Bowling's complaint.