- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Harrisonburg Today
By the People, for the People
Court Dismisses Lawsuit Against Google Over Alleged Online Suppression
Judge rules that Google, as a private company, is not subject to First Amendment claims and that other legal arguments also fail.
Published on Feb. 21, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A man who sued Google for allegedly working with the Vatican and U.S. government to suppress the visibility of his website and social media accounts had his 12-count complaint dismissed by a federal court. The judge ruled that Google, as a private company, is not subject to First Amendment claims, and that the plaintiff's other legal arguments, including common carrier and religious freedom claims, also failed to state a valid case.
Why it matters
This case highlights the challenges individuals face in holding large tech platforms accountable for content moderation decisions, even when they feel their online speech or religious expression is being suppressed. The ruling affirms that private companies like Google are generally not bound by the First Amendment, absent a very high bar for proving they are 'state actors' working in coordination with the government.
The details
Thomas Richards, who runs the website 'SpirituallySmart.com' for his biblical ministry, alleged that Google worked with the Vatican and U.S. government to limit the visibility of his online content. However, the court found his claims of government coordination with Google to be 'far too speculative' to transform the tech company into a state actor subject to constitutional claims. The judge also rejected Richards' arguments that Google should be treated as a common carrier, and dismissed his state law claims as barred by statutes of limitations and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
- The lawsuit was filed in February 2025.
- The court issued its ruling dismissing the case on February 9, 2026.
The players
Thomas Richards
An individual who runs the website 'SpirituallySmart.com' as part of his biblical ministry and sued Google for allegedly suppressing the visibility of his online content.
Google LLC
The tech company that was sued by Richards for allegedly working with the Vatican and U.S. government to limit the visibility of his website and social media accounts.
What’s next
Richards has the option to appeal the court's dismissal of his lawsuit against Google.
The takeaway
This case underscores the difficulty individuals face in holding large tech platforms accountable for content moderation decisions, as the courts have generally ruled that private companies like Google are not bound by the First Amendment absent a very high bar for proving government coordination or control.


