- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Virginia Democrats accused of partisan gerrymandering in new redistricting plan
Proposed constitutional amendment would give Democrats a 10-1 edge in congressional delegation, sparking concerns over fairness and process
Apr. 5, 2026 at 5:07pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Virginia Democrats are proposing a constitutional amendment that would allow the state legislature to redraw congressional district maps, replacing the bipartisan redistricting commission approved by voters just a few years ago. The new maps would give Democrats a significant advantage, with a 10-1 edge in the state's congressional delegation. Critics argue this is a blatant partisan power grab that undermines the will of Virginia voters and the principles of fair representation.
Why it matters
The proposed redistricting plan has sparked a fierce debate over the balance between partisan interests and the democratic process. While Democrats argue the changes would 'restore fairness,' opponents contend it sets a dangerous precedent of using redistricting for political gain, which could backfire when the tables are turned. The outcome could have major implications for Virginia's political landscape and representation in Congress.
The details
The current congressional maps in Virginia were drawn by a bipartisan redistricting commission approved by voters in a 2020 constitutional amendment. The new proposal would scrap those maps and allow the Democrat-controlled state legislature to redraw the districts, resulting in a 10-1 advantage for Democrats in the state's congressional delegation. While the amendment would expire before the next round of redistricting after the 2030 census, critics argue it establishes a worrying precedent of using redistricting for partisan gain.
- The proposed constitutional amendment was introduced in the Virginia General Assembly in March 2026.
- Voters in Virginia will decide on the amendment in a referendum on the November 2026 ballot.
The players
Abigail Spanberger
The Democratic governor of Virginia, who has faced criticism for her apparent support of the partisan redistricting plan.
Virginia Redistricting Commission
The bipartisan commission approved by Virginia voters in 2020 to draw congressional district maps, which would be sidelined under the new proposal.
Virginia General Assembly
The state legislature, currently controlled by Democrats, which would be granted the power to redraw district maps under the proposed amendment.
What they’re saying
“Can she reconcile her 'moderate' image with perhaps the most partisan gerrymandering imaginable? Not if she has supported these maps at every turn.”
— John Chapman 'Chap' Petersen, Former Virginia state senator
“If you're on the fence, consider this simple standard: The process you support today is the process your political opponents will use tomorrow. Democracy is not a tool you wield when you like the outcome and set aside when you don't.”
— Natalie Harrison, Virginia voter
What’s next
The proposed constitutional amendment must pass the Virginia General Assembly before being put to a statewide referendum on the November 2026 ballot. If approved by voters, the new redistricting process would take effect immediately, with the legislature drawing new congressional maps.
The takeaway
The partisan gerrymandering dispute in Virginia highlights the ongoing tension between political interests and the principles of fair representation. While Democrats argue the changes would 'restore fairness,' critics warn it sets a dangerous precedent that could backfire when the political tides inevitably shift. Ultimately, the outcome could have significant implications for Virginia's political landscape and the state's voice in Congress.



