Virginia Civil Rights Leaders Decry 'Misinformation' in Redistricting Fight

Rural conservatives invoke 'Fairfaxphobia' to oppose proposed redistricting map

Apr. 2, 2026 at 11:40am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

As early voting on a proposed redistricting amendment began in Virginia, Republican lawmakers and conservative groups have launched a campaign against the plan, invoking the specter of 'Fairfax County' and 'Northern Virginia' dominating the state's politics. Civil rights leaders have decried this 'misinformation' and argued the redistricting is about checking the policies of the Trump administration, not an 'in-state rivalry'.

Why it matters

The debate over redistricting in Virginia has become a proxy battle between rural conservatives and the state's Democratic-leaning urban and suburban areas, particularly Fairfax County. The outcome could have major implications for the balance of power in the state's congressional delegation.

The details

Republican lawmakers like Del. Joe McNamara and Del. Wren Williams have posted social media messages and videos warning that the proposed redistricting map would 'consolidate power in Northern Virginia' and give Fairfax County outsized influence. An ad from the Freedom Caucus Fund went further, calling Fairfax a 'Sanctuary County' with 'insane Trans, Sex Ed and DEI policies.' Meanwhile, billboards have appeared in Southwest Virginia urging voters to 'Vote No' on a 'Northern Virginia Power Grab.' The factual basis for these claims is that the new map would stretch Northern Virginia districts into Republican strongholds, potentially giving Democrats more House seats.

  • The proposed redistricting amendment is up for a vote on April 21, 2026.
  • Early voting on the amendment began in March 2026 while the state legislature was still in session.

The players

Del. Joe McNamara

A Republican from Roanoke County who recorded a video urging a 'no' vote on the redistricting amendment.

Del. Wren Williams

A Republican from Patrick County who posted a social media message about 'Fairfaxphobia.'

Freedom Caucus Fund

A conservative group that released a video attacking Fairfax County's policies.

Jeff McKay

The chairman of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, a Democrat who defended the county's role as an economic engine for Virginia.

Pat Herrity

The lone Republican on the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, who said he understands why rural Virginians wouldn't want Fairfax Democrats controlling their congressional representation.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This amendment will not only take power away from the local people. It will consolidate power in Northern Virginia.”

— Del. Joe McNamara, Republican from Roanoke County

“Fairfax is a Sanctuary County with Virginia's most insane Trans, Sex Ed and DEI policies. And if you don't vote, they'll control FIVE Virginia Congress Seats. Stop them.”

— Freedom Caucus Fund, Conservative group

“As your reporting has noted, Fairfax County and Northern Virginia play a significant role in funding the rest of the state, from roads and schools to law enforcement. We are a major economic engine for the commonwealth, and it is unclear why that would be seen as a negative, especially for those statewide beneficiaries.”

— Jeff McKay, Chairman, Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

“If I were in rural Virginia, I wouldn't want a bunch of Fairfax or Northern Virginia Democrats controlling my congressional representation or being my congressional representative. I think it's bad from a tax standpoint, bad from a regulatory standpoint, bad from a public safety standpoint, bad from an affordability standpoint — a lot of bads.”

— Pat Herrity, Republican, Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

What’s next

The proposed redistricting amendment will be up for a vote on April 21, 2026.

The takeaway

The debate over redistricting in Virginia has become a proxy battle between rural conservatives and the state's Democratic-leaning urban and suburban areas, particularly Fairfax County. The outcome could have major implications for the balance of power in the state's congressional delegation.