House Republicans Back U.S. Forest Service Plan to Cut Budget, Move Headquarters to Utah

GOP lawmakers signal support for agency's proposed reorganization, despite concerns from Democrats about impacts on research and state resources.

Apr. 17, 2026 at 11:34pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A dynamic, fragmented painting depicting a blurred U.S. Forest Service vehicle or equipment in motion, with overlapping geometric shapes and brushstrokes in muted, earthy tones conceptually representing the agency's proposed reorganization.The proposed reorganization of the U.S. Forest Service aims to decentralize decision-making and shift more responsibility to Western states, sparking debate over the agency's future.Salt Lake City Today

U.S. House Republicans from Western states expressed support for the U.S. Forest Service's plans to cut its budget, move its headquarters to Salt Lake City, and rely more heavily on states to manage millions of acres. Democrats on the budget panel raised concerns about how the proposed changes could drive up costs for states and impact important research. The Forest Service chief defended the reorganization as a way to cut administrative costs and localize decision-making.

Why it matters

The proposed changes to the U.S. Forest Service's structure and funding could have significant impacts on how federal lands are managed across the Western United States. Republicans see the plan as a way to streamline the agency and give states more control, while Democrats worry it will reduce critical research and strain state resources.

The details

The Forest Service chief, Tom Schultz, pitched plans to the House Appropriations Subcommittee to cut the agency's budget, move its headquarters from Washington, D.C. to Salt Lake City, and rely more heavily on states to manage millions of acres of federal land. Republican lawmakers, including the subcommittee chair Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho, expressed support for the proposal. However, Democrats like Rep. Chellie Pingree of Maine raised concerns that states lack the resources to take over the federal government's current forestry responsibilities. Schultz argued the goal is to cut administrative costs and localize decision-making, saying states now have the expertise to manage the land. The reorganization is expected to affect around 5,000 Forest Service employees, with an estimated 500 needing to relocate to Utah.

  • The House Appropriations Subcommittee hearing took place on April 17, 2026.
  • A request for proposals from vendors to conduct an outside review of the proposed merger of the Forest Service and Interior Department wildland fire agencies will go out in early May 2026.
  • The outside review is expected to take up to six months to complete.

The players

Tom Schultz

Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, who presented the agency's reorganization plans to the House subcommittee.

Mike Simpson

Republican Representative from Idaho and chair of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies.

Chellie Pingree

Democratic Representative from Maine and ranking member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies.

Ryan Zinke

Republican Representative from Montana.

Celeste Maloy

Republican Representative from Utah.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“I think it's very interesting what you're proposing to do, and I support it.”

— Mike Simpson, Republican Representative from Idaho, Chair of House Appropriations Subcommittee

“I guarantee you, my state is not prepared to take over all of the things that the federal government is currently doing. We don't have those resources.”

— Chellie Pingree, Democratic Representative from Maine, Ranking Member of House Appropriations Subcommittee

“The opportunity to have a house is better, and you're closer to where the actual forests are.”

— Ryan Zinke, Republican Representative from Montana

“We're excited to have you in Salt Lake. Welcome to Utah.”

— Celeste Maloy, Republican Representative from Utah

What’s next

The outside review of the proposed merger of the Forest Service and Interior Department wildland fire agencies is expected to be completed within the next six months.

The takeaway

The partisan divide over the Forest Service's reorganization plan highlights the ongoing tensions between federal and state control of public lands in the Western U.S. While Republicans see the changes as a way to streamline the agency and empower states, Democrats are concerned about the potential impacts on research, water quality, and state resources.