Sugar House's Controversial Empty Lot Remains Undeveloped

Salt Lake City Council denies hotel proposal, leaving the future of the prime real estate uncertain.

Apr. 9, 2026 at 4:56am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A brightly colored, abstract silkscreen print featuring a repeated image of a vacant lot sign, rendered in a bold, pop art style that captures the tension and uncertainty surrounding the future of this contested urban space.A vacant lot in the heart of Salt Lake City's Sugar House neighborhood remains undeveloped, sparking ongoing debate about the future of the prime real estate.Salt Lake City Today

A proposal to rezone a vacant lot in the Sugar House neighborhood of Salt Lake City for a hotel development was rejected by the city council after significant community feedback expressing concerns about blocking scenic views. The lot, currently leased to Maverik, will remain zoned for mixed-use, leaving its future uncertain as the property owner is not interested in selling to the city to expand the adjacent Sugar House Park.

Why it matters

The empty lot has been a source of controversy in the Sugar House community, with residents divided on what type of development, if any, should occupy the prime real estate. The council's decision reflects the ongoing tension between preserving the neighborhood's character and allowing new development, highlighting the challenges cities face in balancing community interests with private property rights.

The details

The vacant lot, located at the corner of 2100 S and 1300 E, was proposed to be rezoned for a hotel development. However, after extensive public feedback expressing concerns about the hotel blocking scenic views of Sugar House Park and the surrounding area, the city council voted to reject the proposal on Tuesday. The lot will remain zoned for mixed-use, meaning it could potentially be developed for a commercial/residential combination or a restaurant, but it may also continue to sit empty as the current owner, Romney Farr, is leasing the property to Maverik and is not interested in selling to the city to expand the adjacent park.

  • On Tuesday, Salt Lake City council denied the proposal to rezone the land for a hotel.
  • The city has made efforts and inquiries about purchasing the property to expand the park in the past, but the owner has not been interested in selling.

The players

Sarah Young

A Salt Lake City councilmember representing District 7, who said the council ultimately decided to reject the hotel proposal after considering a lot of public feedback.

Romney Farr

The owner of the vacant lot, who is currently leasing the property to Maverik and is not interested in selling to the city to expand the adjacent Sugar House Park.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“After a lot of public comment and consideration, myself and the other council members ultimately decided on Tuesday night to reject that proposal, honoring a lot of the community feedback that we had received throughout the process.”

— Sarah Young, Salt Lake City Councilmember

What’s next

The city has made efforts to purchase the property in the past, but the owner has not been interested in selling. It remains unclear what the future holds for the vacant lot, as it could potentially be developed for a mixed-use project or continue to sit empty.

The takeaway

The debate over the future of the vacant lot in Sugar House highlights the ongoing tension between preserving a neighborhood's character and allowing new development. The city council's decision to reject the hotel proposal reflects the importance of community feedback in shaping the future of local real estate, even when it conflicts with private property rights.