Utah Students Must Complete All Assignments, Regardless of Beliefs

Op-ed argues students should engage with diverse perspectives, even if they conflict with personal views

Apr. 5, 2026 at 12:05pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

In a recent op-ed, Gregory A. Clark argues that Utah students should not be able to opt out of school assignments on the basis of personal beliefs. Clark contends that students should be required to articulate scientific and other positions, even if they conflict with their religious or ideological views.

Why it matters

This debate highlights the ongoing tension between academic freedom, critical thinking, and accommodation of personal beliefs in the classroom. As Utah has a large population of religious students, this issue has significant implications for how schools navigate discussions of sensitive topics that may challenge certain students' worldviews.

The details

Clark's op-ed was published in response to concerns that some Utah students have been allowed to skip assignments that conflict with their personal beliefs, such as those related to evolution or LGBTQ+ issues. He argues that this practice undermines the purpose of education and prevents students from developing well-rounded perspectives.

  • The op-ed was published on April 5, 2026.

The players

Gregory A. Clark

The author of the op-ed and a professor of education at the University of Utah.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Students should be required to articulate scientific and other positions, even if they conflict with their religious beliefs.”

— Gregory A. Clark, Professor of Education

The takeaway

This debate highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing academic freedom, critical thinking, and respect for personal beliefs in the classroom. As Utah's schools navigate this issue, it will be important to find ways to expose students to diverse perspectives while also acknowledging their right to hold and express their own views.