Defense Rests Without Calling Witnesses in Kouri Richins Trial

The decision sparks debate over the prosecution's case and the defendant's strategy.

Mar. 13, 2026 at 3:36am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

In a dramatic turn of events, the defense team in the trial of Kouri Richins, who is charged in connection with the death of her husband Eric Richins, rested its case without calling a single witness. This unexpected move has drawn mixed reactions, with some arguing it suggests the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, while others believe it could make the defendant appear guilty to the jury.

Why it matters

The defense's decision not to present any witnesses is a significant strategic move that could have major implications for the outcome of the trial. It raises questions about the strength of the prosecution's case and the defense's confidence in their ability to raise reasonable doubt.

The details

After nearly three weeks of testimony from prosecutors, the defense rested around 2 p.m. Thursday in the Summit County courthouse. The prosecution had called a range of witnesses, including investigators, a housekeeper, and Richins' boyfriend, to form the foundation of the state's argument against Richins. When it came time for the defense to present its case, attorneys requested an hour-long recess before announcing they would rest without presenting witnesses or additional evidence.

  • The defense rested its case around 2 p.m. on Thursday, March 13, 2026.
  • The prosecution had been presenting its case for nearly three weeks prior to the defense resting.

The players

Kouri Richins

The defendant, who is charged in connection with the death of her husband, Eric Richins.

Eric Richins

Kouri Richins' husband, whose death is the subject of the trial.

Skye Lazaro

A defense attorney who commented on the defense's decision to rest without calling witnesses.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This is always a strategic decision to be made. In those cases similar to this I think the defense in this case did a really phenomenal job crossing examining the state, limiting what the state could bring in, making every argument that they possibly could.”

— Skye Lazaro, Defense Attorney (KJZZ)

What’s next

Attorneys for both sides are scheduled to meet on Friday to discuss jury instructions. Jurors will return to court on Monday to hear closing arguments before beginning deliberations.

The takeaway

The defense's unexpected decision not to call any witnesses has sparked debate over the strength of the prosecution's case and the defendant's strategy. While legal experts say the tactic is not uncommon, it marks a pivotal moment in the trial and raises questions about the path forward for both sides.