Federal Court Allows New Utah Congressional Map Favoring Democrats

The redrawn district boundaries could flip a Republican-held House seat in the 2026 midterms.

Published on Feb. 24, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal court has rejected a Republican-led effort to block a new congressional redistricting map in Utah that creates a Democrat-leaning district in Salt Lake City. The revised map, ordered by a state judge, is expected to give Democrats a better chance of winning the 1st Congressional District, which is currently held by a Republican.

Why it matters

The decision could have significant implications for the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives, as the new Utah map has the potential to flip a Republican-held seat to the Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections. This comes at a time when the current House GOP majority is held by a slim margin.

The details

The federal three-judge panel denied a request by Utah Republicans for a preliminary injunction to put the new congressional map on hold. The revised boundaries give Democrats a stronger foothold in the 1st Congressional District, which is currently represented by Republican Rep. Blake Moore. Two other GOP House members, Reps. Burgess Owens and Celeste Maloy, had also joined the legal challenge but have now accepted the court's decision.

  • On February 24, 2026, a federal court refused to block the new Utah congressional redistricting map.

The players

Blake Moore

The Republican U.S. Representative for Utah's 1st Congressional District, whose seat is expected to become more Democratic-leaning under the new map.

Burgess Owens

A Republican U.S. Representative from Utah who had joined the legal challenge to the new congressional map but has now accepted the court's decision.

Celeste Maloy

A Republican U.S. Representative from Utah who had joined the legal challenge to the new congressional map but has now accepted the court's decision.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We receive today's decision with profound disappointment but respect for the Court's careful review. This case concerns the Constitution's allocation of authority over federal elections, a question of lasting importance beyond any single election cycle.”

— Burgess Owens and Celeste Maloy, Republican U.S. Representatives from Utah (X)

What’s next

The Republican plaintiffs can still appeal the federal court's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, but the judges warned that any further 'tinkering' with the map would come too late to prevent electoral disruption for the 2026 midterms.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing debate over the balance of power in Congress and the role of redistricting in shaping electoral outcomes. The new Utah map could have significant implications for the 2026 midterm elections, potentially flipping a Republican-held House seat to the Democrats.