Nurse Accused of Murdering Friend Who Believed She Had Cancer

Meggan Sundwall to stand trial next week on charges of aggravated murder and obstruction of justice

Published on Mar. 4, 2026

Meggan Sundwall, a Utah nurse, is scheduled to stand trial next week on charges of aggravated murder and obstruction of justice in the death of her friend, Kacee Terry. Prosecutors have accused Sundwall of leading Terry to believe that she had terminal cancer, and Terry later died of an insulin overdose. Sundwall's attorneys argue that Terry killed herself.

Why it matters

This case highlights the complex issues surrounding alleged medical deception and its potential consequences. It raises questions about the boundaries of care, the impact of false information on vulnerable individuals, and the challenges of determining intent in cases of suspected suicide.

The details

At a pretrial hearing, Sundwall's defense did not object to prosecutors' request to admit Terry's statements, even those in which she said that Sundwall was trying to kill her. The defense plans to introduce many of Terry's alleged lies, including claims that her family hated her and that her daughter died. Sundwall's attorneys argue that failing to render aid is not a criminal act under Utah law, while the prosecution contends that Sundwall made 'affirmative acts...that prolonged the amount of time before medical aid was able to be rendered'.

  • Meggan Sundwall's trial is scheduled to begin on March 11, 2026.

The players

Meggan Sundwall

A Utah nurse facing charges of aggravated murder and obstruction of justice in the death of her friend, Kacee Terry.

Kacee Terry

The alleged victim who died of an insulin overdose after being led to believe she had terminal cancer by Sundwall.

Scott Williams

Sundwall's attorney, who argued that Terry's statements should not be admitted for the truth of the matter asserted and that failing to render aid is not a criminal act under Utah law.

Lauren Hunt

The prosecutor, who countered that Sundwall made 'affirmative acts...that prolonged the amount of time before medical aid was able to be rendered'.

Judge Sean Petersen

The judge presiding over the pretrial hearing, who said he would address the issues as they come up during the trial.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Our position is that nothing she ever said was for the truth of the matter asserted. We don't think anything she ever said was true.”

— Scott Williams, Sundwall's attorney (Court TV)

“Sundwall made 'affirmative acts...that prolonged the amount of time before medical aid was able to be rendered'.”

— Lauren Hunt, Prosecutor (Court TV)

What’s next

The judge will address the issues raised during the pretrial hearing as they come up during Sundwall's trial, which is scheduled to begin on March 11, 2026.

The takeaway

This case highlights the complex ethical and legal issues surrounding alleged medical deception and its potential consequences. It raises important questions about the boundaries of care, the impact of false information on vulnerable individuals, and the challenges of determining intent in cases of suspected suicide.