Utah Judge Rejects Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors in Charlie Kirk Killing Case

The defense argued a conflict of interest due to a prosecutor's daughter being present during the shooting.

Published on Feb. 24, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A Utah judge has rejected a motion by the defense to disqualify the local county attorney's office from prosecuting the accused shooter in the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The defense argued there was a conflict of interest because a prosecutor's adult daughter was present when Kirk was shot at a rally on the Utah Valley University campus. However, the judge ruled there was not a significant risk that the prosecutor's loyalty to his daughter would affect the case.

Why it matters

This case has drawn significant public attention due to Kirk's high-profile status as a conservative activist. The defense's attempt to disqualify the prosecutors based on a perceived conflict of interest raised questions about the fairness of the proceedings and the ability of the local prosecutors to handle such a high-profile case objectively.

The details

Tyler Robinson, 22, is accused of fatally shooting Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2026 during a rally on the Utah Valley University campus in Orem. Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty against Robinson, who has not yet entered a plea. The defense argued that the Utah County Attorney's Office should be disqualified because a deputy county attorney's adult daughter was present during the shooting, and that prosecutors were too quick to announce their intent to seek the death penalty, indicating 'strong emotional reactions.' However, the judge ruled that the daughter's presence did not factor into the prosecutor's decision-making, and that 'prosecutors need not be immune to the emotional response of others to prosecute a case.'

  • On September 10, 2026, Charlie Kirk was shot and killed during a rally on the Utah Valley University campus in Orem.
  • On January 16, 2026, Tyler Robinson, the accused shooter, appeared in court with his defense attorney Kathryn Nester.
  • On February 24, 2026, the judge ruled on the defense's motion to disqualify the prosecutors.

The players

Tyler Robinson

A 22-year-old man accused of fatally shooting Charlie Kirk.

Kathryn Nester

The defense attorney representing Tyler Robinson.

Chad Grunander

A deputy Utah County Attorney whose adult daughter was present during the shooting of Charlie Kirk.

Jeffrey Gray

The Utah County Attorney who testified that he thought about seeking the death penalty before an arrest had been made in the case.

Tony Graf

The state district judge who ruled on the defense's motion to disqualify the prosecutors.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Prosecutors need not be immune to the emotional response of others to prosecute a case.”

— Tony Graf, State District Judge (eastidahonews.com)

“Chad Grunander's daughter is not going to be a witness. She didn't actually see Mr. Kirk killed. She was facing away.”

— Robert Church, Director of Utah Prosecution Council (eastidahonews.com)

What’s next

The judge has been weighing other issues of fairness for Robinson, should he go to trial, including whether to allow full video recordings of Kirk's shooting to be shown in court and whether to keep TV cameras and photographers out of the courtroom.

The takeaway

This ruling highlights the challenges of ensuring a fair trial in high-profile cases where emotions run high, and the need to carefully consider potential conflicts of interest among prosecutors without unduly disqualifying them from handling such cases.