Judge Denies Bid to Remove Prosecutor in Charlie Kirk Murder Case

Tyler Robinson fails to get top prosecutor removed over daughter's presence at rally where Kirk was killed

Published on Feb. 24, 2026

A Utah judge has rejected Tyler Robinson's attempt to remove prosecutors from his murder case against Charlie Kirk, the conservative political commentator. Robinson argued that the prosecutor's office should be disqualified because one of the prosecutor's daughters was present at the rally where Kirk was assassinated. However, Judge Tony Graf ruled that the decision to pursue the death penalty against Robinson was not influenced by the daughter's presence.

Why it matters

This ruling is significant as it allows the high-profile prosecution of Robinson, the alleged killer of a prominent conservative figure, to move forward without disruption. The case has drawn national attention and the judge's decision preserves the integrity of the legal process.

The details

In his ruling, Judge Graf found that the prosecutor's office's decision to pursue the death penalty against Robinson was not influenced by the fact that one of the prosecutor's daughters was present at the rally where Kirk was killed. Robinson had argued that the daughter's presence created a conflict of interest, but the judge disagreed and denied Robinson's bid to have the prosecutors removed from the case.

  • On September 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk was assassinated at a public rally.
  • On Tuesday, the judge held a video hearing to rule on Robinson's motion to remove the prosecutors.

The players

Tyler Robinson

The defendant accused of murdering Charlie Kirk.

Judge Tony Graf

The judge presiding over the Tyler Robinson murder case.

Charlie Kirk

The conservative political commentator who was assassinated at a public rally.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Yes, I can your honor.”

— Tyler Robinson (nypost.com)

What’s next

The judge's ruling allows the prosecution of Tyler Robinson to move forward. The case is expected to proceed to trial.

The takeaway

This decision preserves the integrity of the legal process in a high-profile murder case involving a prominent conservative figure. It demonstrates the court's commitment to upholding the rule of law, even in the face of attempts to disrupt the prosecution.