Richins trial delayed as attorneys dispute key witness interview

Prosecutors seek to admit portions of interview, defense wants full transcript shown to jurors

Mar. 11, 2026 at 1:37am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The murder trial for Kamas mom Kouri Richins, accused of fatally poisoning her husband, was delayed on Tuesday as attorneys argued over what portions of a key witness interview should be shown to the jury. The prosecution wants to admit 100 pages of the interview transcript, while the defense argues the full 1,000-page transcript should be presented.

Why it matters

This case has garnered significant attention as Richins is accused of a premeditated murder plot involving poisoning her husband. The dispute over the witness interview evidence highlights the complex legal maneuvering and evidentiary issues that can arise in high-profile criminal trials.

The details

The main issue that led the judge to grant a one-day continuance was how to address the prosecution's request to admit portions of interviews from their key witness, Carmen Lauber, who testified about providing drugs to Richins. The defense argued that if the partial transcript is admitted, the entire 1,000-page set of interviews should be shown to provide full context. The judge denied the defense's request to present the full transcript, saying it would be a waste of the jury's time.

  • The trial resumed on Wednesday, March 12, 2026 after the one-day delay.

The players

Kouri Richins

A Kamas, Utah mom accused of fatally poisoning her husband, Eric Richins, in March 2022.

Jeff O'Driscoll

The lead investigator on the case, who is expected to be the next witness called by prosecutors.

Carmen Lauber

A key witness who testified about providing drugs to Kouri Richins.

Wendy Lewis

The defense attorney representing Kouri Richins.

Brad Bloodworth

The deputy Summit County attorney prosecuting the case.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“There's a lot that's being left out, and a lot of what's being left out are the statements where officers are telling her about what she needs to do in order to not have to go to jail, what kind of deals they're willing to make for her.”

— Wendy Lewis, Defense Attorney (eastidahonews.com)

“I don't think it's productive, I think it's a waste of the jury's time.”

— Judge Richard Mrazik, 3rd District Judge (eastidahonews.com)

What’s next

The trial is expected to resume on Wednesday, March 12, 2026 after the one-day delay, with the lead investigator, Jeff O'Driscoll, expected to be the next witness called by prosecutors.

The takeaway

This case highlights the complex legal battles that can arise in high-profile criminal trials, as attorneys argue over the admissibility and scope of key evidence. The dispute over the witness interview transcript underscores the importance of carefully managing the presentation of evidence to the jury.