- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Orem Today
By the People, for the People
New Bullet Analysis Delays Hearing in Charlie Kirk Killing Case
Lawyers for the accused say federal authorities were unable to conclusively link a recovered bullet fragment to the rifle found at the scene.
Mar. 31, 2026 at 11:03am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Forensic analysis of evidence in the high-profile case raises new questions about the prosecution's case.Orem TodayLawyers for Tyler Robinson, the man accused of killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk in Utah, have claimed that a federal analysis was unable to conclusively link a recovered bullet fragment to the rifle found near the scene of Kirk's death. Robinson's team has requested a postponement of his preliminary hearing as they investigate the issues arising from the bullet analysis, though prosecutors want to proceed with the trial, stating they have enough evidence to do so.
Why it matters
The inability to conclusively link the bullet fragment to the rifle could significantly impact the prosecution's case against Robinson, potentially raising reasonable doubt about his involvement in Kirk's killing. This development highlights the importance of forensic evidence in high-profile criminal cases and the potential for unexpected twists and turns as the legal process unfolds.
The details
According to a recent court filing, a Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) report was unable to conclude that the bullet fragments recovered were from the rifle found at the scene of Charlie Kirk's shooting. Robinson's lawyers have cited this analysis and said the FBI is running new tests. They have also claimed that multiple people's DNA was found on some items at the scene, necessitating further investigation.
- On September 10, 2026, Charlie Kirk was fatally shot at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah.
- Days after the shooting, authorities arrested 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, who they said had confessed to the crime to his father.
- Robinson's preliminary hearing was originally scheduled for May 2027.
- Robinson will next appear in court on April 17, 2027, for a hearing on a defense motion to ban cameras from the courtroom during his case.
The players
Tyler Robinson
A 22-year-old man who has been arrested and charged with aggravated murder, obstruction of justice, and felony discharge of a firearm in the killing of Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk
A 31-year-old conservative activist who was fatally shot during a question-and-answer session at Utah Valley University.
What they’re saying
“The case has attracted extraordinary public and media attention. Images of Mr. Robinson in jail clothing are likely to circulate widely and influence prospective jurors. Given the scale of that publicity, the risk of prejudice is significant.”
— Tony Graf, Fourth District Court Judge
What’s next
The judge in the case will decide on April 17 whether or not to grant the defense's motion to ban cameras from the courtroom during Robinson's case. Additionally, the preliminary hearing that was originally scheduled for May 2027 has been postponed as Robinson's lawyers investigate the issues arising from the bullet analysis.
The takeaway
This case highlights the importance of forensic evidence in high-profile criminal cases and the potential for unexpected developments that could significantly impact the prosecution's case. The inability to conclusively link the bullet fragment to the rifle found at the scene raises reasonable doubt and could be a crucial factor as the legal process continues to unfold.

