- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Texas City Today
By the People, for the People
FCC Chair Threatens Broadcast License Revocation Over 'Distorted' Iran War Coverage
Carr warns news outlets they could lose licenses if they air misleading reports on the conflict.
Mar. 15, 2026 at 12:48am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr has threatened to revoke the broadcast licenses of news outlets if they air what he describes as misleading coverage of the ongoing war involving Iran. Carr's warning comes after former President Donald Trump accused major newspapers like The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal of intentionally misrepresenting developments in the conflict.
Why it matters
Carr's threat to broadcasters highlights the growing tensions between the FCC and news organizations over how political and wartime content is handled on air. The FCC chair has taken a more aggressive stance in scrutinizing broadcasters' programming under the agency's 'public interest' standard, raising concerns from critics about potential government overreach in policing editorial decisions.
The details
In a post on social media, Carr said broadcasters spreading 'inaccurate reporting' and 'hoaxes' should 'correct course' before their license renewals come up. He did not specify which outlets may be at risk, but his comments included a screenshot of a post from former President Trump criticizing coverage by The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. Trump claimed their headlines about Iranian strikes destroying tanker aircraft at a Saudi base were 'intentionally misleading.' Carr has previously pointed to the FCC's 'news distortion' policy as a potential tool to scrutinize stations' programming.
- Carr issued the warning on March 15, 2026.
The players
Brendan Carr
The current Chair of the Federal Communications Commission, who has taken a more aggressive stance in scrutinizing broadcasters' programming under the agency's 'public interest' standard.
Donald Trump
The former President of the United States, who accused major newspapers like The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal of intentionally misrepresenting developments in the ongoing war involving Iran.
The New York Times
A major U.S. newspaper that has faced criticism from former President Trump over its coverage of the war involving Iran.
The Wall Street Journal
A major U.S. newspaper that has faced criticism from former President Trump over its coverage of the war involving Iran.
What they’re saying
“Broadcasters that are running hoaxes and news distortions — also known as the fake news — have a chance now to correct course before their license renewals come up. The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will lose their licenses if they do not.”
— Brendan Carr, FCC Chair
“The headlines reporting that Iranian strikes had destroyed tanker aircraft at a Saudi base were intentionally misleading. The planes were not destroyed and most were already back in service. This is the exact opposite of the actual facts.”
— Donald Trump
What’s next
The FCC will likely closely monitor the coverage of the war involving Iran by broadcasters in the coming months, and Carr has threatened to take action against any outlets that he deems are airing 'distorted' or 'misleading' reports.
The takeaway
Carr's threat to revoke broadcast licenses over coverage of the Iran war highlights the ongoing tensions between the FCC and news organizations over how political and wartime content is handled on air. This move raises concerns about potential government overreach in policing editorial decisions and the potential chilling effect it could have on press freedom.


