San Antonio Judge Indicted for Alleged Courtroom Handcuffing

Bexar County Judge Rosie Speedlin-Gonzalez faces felony and misdemeanor charges related to a 2024 incident.

Jan. 29, 2026 at 5:23pm

Bexar County Judge Rosie Speedlin-Gonzalez has been indicted on charges of unlawfully restraining a peace officer or judge and official oppression. The charges stem from an incident in her courtroom in December 2024 where she allegedly ordered a defense attorney to be handcuffed and seated in the jury box.

Why it matters

The case raises concerns about judicial misconduct and the appropriate use of power by judges in the courtroom. It also highlights the importance of accountability for those in positions of authority, even among the judiciary.

The details

According to the indictment, on December 17, 2024, Judge Speedlin-Gonzalez ordered a defense attorney to be handcuffed and seated in the jury box during a motion-to-revoke-probation hearing. The attorney later filed a criminal complaint alleging official oppression and unlawful restraint. Speedlin-Gonzalez has served on the bench since 2019 and oversees a specialty docket for first-time domestic violence offenders.

  • The alleged incident occurred on December 17, 2024.
  • Speedlin-Gonzalez was indicted by a grand jury on Thursday, January 29, 2026.
  • The case has been assigned to the 379th District Court.

The players

Judge Rosie Speedlin-Gonzalez

A judge on the Bexar County Court at Law No. 13 who has served on the bench since 2019 and oversees a specialty docket for first-time domestic violence offenders.

Brian Cromeens

A special prosecutor from Goliad County who has been assigned to handle the prosecution of the case against Judge Speedlin-Gonzalez.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“take her into custody and put her in the box”

— Judge Rosie Speedlin-Gonzalez (KSAT)

What’s next

The case will proceed in the 379th District Court, and the indictment remains active in the docket. Special Prosecutor Cromeens has not yet responded to requests for comment, and Judge Speedlin-Gonzalez has not provided an immediate response to questions.

The takeaway

This case highlights the importance of judicial accountability and the appropriate use of power by those in positions of authority within the legal system. It raises concerns about misconduct and the need for oversight to ensure the fair administration of justice.