FCC Commissioner Praises Conservative Crackdown on 'Fake News'

Brendan Carr touted regulatory actions against media outlets at CPAC event.

Mar. 29, 2026 at 1:44am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Commissioner Brendan Carr spoke at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on Friday, where he highlighted what he described as successes in addressing what he termed 'fake news media.' Carr's comments come after the FCC, under his leadership, approved a television merger that sparked disagreement within conservative media circles. He has also threatened broadcast licenses over what he considers 'war propaganda.'

Why it matters

Carr's appearance at a partisan political event and his framing of regulatory actions in terms of 'winning' against media outlets raises concerns about the perceived independence of the FCC and the potential for politically motivated decision-making. His statements suggest a continued focus on challenging the narratives presented by certain media organizations, which could lead to further actions related to broadcast licenses or media ownership.

The details

During his CPAC speech, Commissioner Carr discussed his efforts to address what he identified as 'fake news media.' This includes the FCC's recent approval of a television merger that sparked disagreement within conservative media circles, as well as threats to revoke broadcast licenses over content the commissioner deems 'war propaganda.'

  • Carr spoke at the CPAC event on Friday, March 29, 2026.
  • The FCC, under Carr's leadership, recently approved a television merger.

The players

Brendan Carr

A commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) who has taken actions targeting media outlets he identifies as 'fake news.'

Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC)

An annual political conference that brings together conservative activists, politicians, and media figures.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident

The takeaway

Carr's actions and rhetoric raise concerns about the potential for politically motivated decision-making at the FCC, which is supposed to operate independently. This case highlights the broader debate over the role of media regulation and the balance between free speech and the public interest.