- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Deer Park Today
By the People, for the People
Autopilot/Driver Assist Crashes: Who Is at Fault When Tech Is Involved?
Insurers, police and juries want to know who is responsible—the driver, the technology or both?
Published on Feb. 16, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
This article explores the complex issue of liability in crashes involving driver-assist technologies like adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping. While these features can make driving easier, they don't remove the driver's responsibility to supervise the system and make safe choices. In many cases, the driver is still found at fault for inattention or misuse of the technology. However, there are situations where the technology itself may be to blame, such as unexpected failures or design flaws that encourage over-reliance. Determining liability often requires careful investigation of vehicle data, repair records, and other evidence.
Why it matters
As driver-assist technologies become more common, understanding liability in crashes involving these systems is crucial. It impacts insurance claims, legal proceedings, and public perception of the safety and trustworthiness of these technologies. Establishing clear guidelines around driver responsibility and technological failures is important for promoting responsible use and continued innovation.
The details
Driver-assist features like adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping can help make driving easier, but they still require the driver to remain attentive and ready to take control. Insurers, police, and juries often find the driver at fault in crashes, arguing that they misused the system or weren't paying enough attention. However, the technology itself can also play a role, such as unexpected failures, design flaws that encourage over-reliance, or sensor issues after repairs. Liability may extend beyond just the driver in cases where there is evidence of a defect, inadequate warnings, or misleading design. Preserving technical evidence like vehicle data logs, dashcam footage, and repair records is crucial for determining responsibility.
- This article was published on February 16, 2026.
The players
Deer Park, Texas
A city in Texas where experienced car accident lawyers are located that can help determine liability in crashes involving driver-assist technologies.
The takeaway
As driver-assist technologies become more prevalent, it's crucial for drivers to understand their responsibilities and limitations when using these systems. Liability in crashes can be complex, involving both driver actions and potential technology failures or design flaws. Seeking legal counsel and preserving technical evidence is important for determining responsibility and seeking appropriate compensation when these systems are involved in an accident.
