Time Travel Dilemma: Would Changing the Past Really Improve Our Lives?

Exploring the complexities of altering history and the unintended consequences that could arise.

Jan. 27, 2026 at 7:39pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Rev. Dr. William Holland examines the popular notion of going back in time to change past decisions and mistakes, questioning whether such changes would truly lead to better outcomes. He reflects on his own life experiences, the role of free will versus God's will, and a fictional story about a man who travels back in time to prevent the assassination of President Kennedy, only to find the present drastically altered in unforeseen ways. The article explores the idea that altering the past may not always result in the desired improvements to our lives and the lives of others.

Why it matters

This story delves into the complex philosophical and theological questions surrounding the concept of time travel and the ability to change the past. It challenges the common assumption that fixing past mistakes would automatically lead to a better present, highlighting the potential for unintended consequences that could arise from such actions. The article encourages readers to consider the role of divine providence and the limits of human understanding when it comes to altering the course of history.

The details

The article discusses the human tendency to wonder what we would change if we could go back in time, reflecting on personal regrets and mistakes. It explores the idea that while some choices only affected our own lives, others had broader impacts that were beyond our control. The author then introduces a fictional story about a man who travels back in time to prevent the assassination of President Kennedy, only to find that his actions have led to a drastically altered and devastated present. This example is used to illustrate the potential pitfalls of attempting to change the past, even with the best of intentions.

  • The article was published on January 28, 2026.
  • It references a fictional story about a man who travels back to 1960 to prevent the assassination of President Kennedy, which occurred on November 23, 1963.

The players

The Rev. Dr. William Holland

An ordained minister, chaplain, teacher, and author who explores the Christian life and philosophical questions surrounding time travel and the ability to change the past.

Garth Brooks

A country music singer-songwriter whose song about thanking God for unanswered prayers is referenced in the article.

Maya Angelou

An acclaimed American poet, memoirist, and civil rights activist, whose quote about facing history with courage is included in the article.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“History, despite its pain, cannot be unlived, but if faced with courage, need not be lived again.”

— Maya Angelou

“Not my will, but thine be done.”

— Jesus

“Therefore do not be like them. For your Father knows the things you have need of before you ask Him.”

— Matthew 6:8

The takeaway

This article encourages readers to consider the complex philosophical and theological implications of time travel and the ability to change the past. It highlights the potential for unintended consequences and the limits of human understanding when it comes to altering the course of history, ultimately suggesting that we may not always know what is truly best, and that we should trust in the wisdom and providence of a higher power.