- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
KBRA Withdraws Four Ratings for JPMBB 2016-C1 CMBS Deal
Review of the commercial mortgage-backed securities transaction reveals challenges in the office sector, particularly in Manhattan and Austin.
Jan. 29, 2026 at 7:31pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
KBRA's recent review of the JPMBB 2016-C1 Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) transaction offers a snapshot of the ongoing turbulence within the commercial real estate market, particularly the office sector. While affirming ratings on several classes, the withdrawal of ratings on interest-only certificates and the detailed performance updates on individual loans reveal a landscape fraught with challenges – and foreshadow potential trends for the broader CMBS market.
Why it matters
The performance of the remaining nine assets within the JPMBB 2016-C1 pool paints a concerning picture, especially regarding Manhattan office properties. This concentration of distress within a single geographic market underscores the vulnerability of prime office locations to factors like remote work trends and economic uncertainty. The struggles are not limited to New York, as the Austin office market also faces headwinds, suggesting that even previously robust markets are not immune to the broader office sector downturn.
The details
The withdrawal of ratings for the four interest-only classes within JPMBB 2016-C1 highlights a natural maturation process for CMBS deals, but also reflects the increasing complexity of managing these instruments as loan pools shrink and risk profiles evolve. Three of the four largest loans – 215 Park Avenue South, 5 Penn Plaza, and 32 Avenue of the Americas – are either on the watchlist or have been transferred to special servicing, demonstrating the proactive, yet often costly, measures lenders are taking to avoid outright defaults. The substantial equity contribution from the borrower is a positive sign, but the long-term viability remains uncertain. The presence of seven K-LOCs (Key Loan Outstanding Concerns) – representing 71.1% of the pool balance – is a critical indicator, as these loans are flagged for potential losses and their performance will heavily influence the overall outcome of the transaction.
- KBRA's recent review of the JPMBB 2016-C1 CMBS transaction was conducted in January 2026.
The players
KBRA
Kroll Bond Rating Agency, a credit rating agency that provides ratings and research on various financial instruments, including CMBS.
JPMBB 2016-C1
A commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) transaction that was reviewed by KBRA.
215 Park Avenue South
One of the four largest loans within the JPMBB 2016-C1 pool, which is on the watchlist due to its impending maturity.
5 Penn Plaza
One of the four largest loans within the JPMBB 2016-C1 pool, which has been transferred to special servicing and undergone a loan modification.
32 Avenue of the Americas
One of the four largest loans within the JPMBB 2016-C1 pool, which faces significant headwinds with a substantial drop in occupancy and an estimated loss severity of 41.2%.
What’s next
Investors may increasingly prioritize CMBS deals with greater geographic diversification to mitigate the risk of concentrated exposure to struggling markets, and focus more on industrial and multifamily properties, which are likely to remain more resilient than office and retail.
The takeaway
The JPMBB 2016-C1 review highlights the ongoing challenges in the commercial real estate market, particularly in the office sector, with increased loan modifications, rising loss severities, and the need for greater scrutiny of underwriting standards in the CMBS market. These trends are likely to shape the future of the CMBS industry as it navigates the shifting landscape.




