Judge Orders Restoration of Slavery Exhibits at Washington's Home

Ruling compares monument changes to Orwellian rewriting of history

Published on Feb. 18, 2026

A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to temporarily restore exhibits on George Washington's enslaved household at the President's House Site in Philadelphia. The judge granted the city's request for a preliminary injunction, finding the government had overstepped in removing the exhibits without warning last month in the name of 'accuracy, honesty, and alignment with shared national values.'

Why it matters

The ruling highlights ongoing debates over how to interpret and present the history of slavery and its role in the founding of the United States. The judge argued that removing the exhibits provided visitors with a distorted picture of US history, comparing it to the 'Ministry of Truth' in Orwell's 1984.

The details

The National Park Service had removed panels, displays, and video presentations about the enslaved people who lived at Washington's Philadelphia home. The judge, a George W. Bush appointee, found this action to be an overreach and ordered the exhibits to be temporarily restored while the lawsuit continues.

  • The exhibits were removed by the National Park Service last month.
  • The judge's ruling came on Presidents Day 2026.

The players

Judge Cynthia M. Rufe

A federal judge who granted Philadelphia's request for a preliminary injunction, ordering the Trump administration to restore the slavery exhibits at the President's House Site.

National Park Service

The government agency that removed the panels, displays, and video presentations about enslaved people at George Washington's former Philadelphia home.

George Washington

The nation's first president, who kept slaves at his Philadelphia home.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The government cannot 'dissemble and disassemble historical truths' at will.”

— Judge Cynthia M. Rufe (New York Times)

What’s next

The judge's order blocks further changes at the monument and keeps the slavery exhibits in place while the lawsuit continues.

The takeaway

This ruling underscores the ongoing debate over how to accurately and responsibly interpret the history of slavery and its role in the founding of the United States, particularly at historic sites and national monuments.