Tennessee House Passes Bill Allowing Private Citizens to Decline Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages

LGBTQ+ advocates warn of potential legal and civil rights implications

Published on Feb. 27, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Tennessee House of Representatives has passed House Bill 1473, which states that private citizens and organizations are not legally required to recognize same-sex marriages. The bill now moves to the Tennessee Senate for consideration. Supporters argue the measure does not change existing law but clarifies that the 14th Amendment and the Supreme Court's Obergefell v. Hodges ruling are not binding on private citizens. Opponents contend the bill undermines established constitutional protections and could create legal uncertainty.

Why it matters

This legislation has the potential to significantly impact the legal and civil rights of same-sex couples in Tennessee, as it could undermine the constitutional protections established by the 14th Amendment and the Supreme Court's Obergefell v. Hodges ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. LGBTQ+ advocates warn the bill could create confusion around benefits, property rights, and other legal recognitions tied to marriage.

The details

House Bill 1473 was passed by the Tennessee House of Representatives in a 68-24 vote. The bill states that private citizens and organizations are not legally required to recognize same-sex marriages, despite the 14th Amendment's protections and the Supreme Court's 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. Supporters argue the bill does not change existing law but simply clarifies that these federal protections do not apply to private citizens, while opponents contend the legislation undermines civil rights and could create legal uncertainty.

  • The Tennessee House of Representatives passed House Bill 1473 on Thursday, February 20, 2026.

The players

House Bill 1473

Legislation passed by the Tennessee House of Representatives that states private citizens and organizations are not required to recognize same-sex marriages.

Gino Bulso

The Republican representative from Brentwood, Tennessee who sponsored House Bill 1473.

John Ray Clemmons

The Democratic representative from Nashville, Tennessee who argued the legislation attempts to weaken long-standing civil rights protections.

Molly Quinn

The CEO of OUTMemphis, an LGBTQ+ advocacy organization, who expressed concern about the potential impact of the bill on same-sex marriages in Tennessee.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This is a bill that does not change existing law. It simply clarifies existing law. It provides that the 14th Amendment and the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation...in Obergefell...are not binding on private citizens.”

— Gino Bulso, Representative, Brentwood, Tennessee (localmemphis.com)

“The 14th Amendment covers a whole host of things — citizenship, civil rights, equal protection, due process...That speaks to the gravity of this.”

— John Ray Clemmons, Representative, Nashville, Tennessee (localmemphis.com)

“Same-sex marriages in Tennessee are embedded into how we pay taxes, how we file employment paperwork, how we buy homes and how we build our families. Those 13,000 marriages, including mine, are very much ready to protect our right to exist and our dignity in Tennessee.”

— Molly Quinn, CEO, OUTMemphis (localmemphis.com)

What’s next

If the bill passes the Tennessee Senate and is signed into law, it will likely face court challenges from opponents who argue it undermines established constitutional protections.

The takeaway

This legislation highlights the ongoing tensions between religious freedom and LGBTQ+ rights, and the potential for legal battles over the scope of constitutional protections for same-sex couples. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for the legal and civil rights of the LGBTQ+ community in Tennessee.