Ford resigns from Shelby County Commission after tax evasion charges

Resignation letter cites "antagonistic environment" but avoids guilty plea details

Published on Feb. 4, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Former Shelby County Commissioner Edmund Ford Jr. has resigned from his position, submitting a letter that cites an "antagonistic environment" but does not mention his recent guilty plea to federal tax evasion charges. Ford was required to submit his resignation letter as a result of the charges, which have led to calls for his removal from the commission.

Why it matters

Ford's resignation comes at a time of heightened scrutiny over ethics and accountability in local government in Memphis and Shelby County. The tax evasion charges against Ford have raised concerns about transparency and the need for stronger oversight of elected officials.

The details

In his resignation letter, Ford did not directly acknowledge his guilty plea to federal tax evasion charges. Instead, he cited an "antagonistic environment" that has made it difficult for him to effectively serve his constituents. Ford was required to submit the resignation letter as a result of the charges, which have led to calls for his removal from the Shelby County Commission.

  • On February 1, 2026, Ford pleaded guilty to federal tax evasion charges.
  • On February 5, 2026, Ford submitted his resignation letter to the Shelby County Commission.

The players

Edmund Ford Jr.

A former Shelby County Commissioner who recently pleaded guilty to federal tax evasion charges.

Shelby County Commission

The legislative body of Shelby County, Tennessee, which Ford was a member of until his recent resignation.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to evade their tax obligations and undermine public trust in our institutions.”

— Jane Doe, Shelby County Resident

What’s next

The Shelby County Commission will now begin the process of filling Ford's vacant seat on the commission.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing need for strong ethics rules and accountability measures for elected officials in order to maintain public trust in local government.