Food Stamp Recipients Sue USDA Over Sugary Drink Restrictions

Lawsuit challenges Trump-era waivers that limit use of benefits for certain foods and beverages

Published on Mar. 12, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A group of food stamp recipients has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture, challenging the agency's approval of waivers that restrict the use of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to purchase sugary drinks, energy drinks, and candy in 22 states. The plaintiffs argue the restrictions 'destabilize food access' for SNAP participants and force them to choose between spending cash on restricted items or forgoing spending on basics like rent and transportation.

Why it matters

The lawsuit highlights the ongoing debate over the role of government in regulating what low-income Americans can purchase with food assistance benefits. Proponents of the restrictions argue they promote healthier eating, while critics say they limit personal choice and access to necessary items.

The details

The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Washington, D.C. by five SNAP recipients from Colorado, Iowa, Nebraska, Tennessee, and West Virginia. They claim the USDA exceeded its legal authority by approving the waivers without proper decision-making. One plaintiff, Amanda Johnson of Knoxville, Tennessee, says the restrictions would severely limit her autistic daughter's food options due to a serious eating disorder.

  • The lawsuit was filed on March 11, 2026.

The players

U.S. Department of Agriculture

The federal agency that oversees the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps.

Brooke Rollins

The current U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, who has endorsed the SNAP benefit restrictions as part of the 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The current U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, who has also endorsed the SNAP benefit restrictions as part of the MAHA movement.

Amanda Johnson

A SNAP recipient from Knoxville, Tennessee, whose autistic 19-year-old daughter would be severely limited in her food options due to the restrictions.

National Center for Law and Economic Justice

The nonprofit organization representing the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, which advocates on behalf of low-income people.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.