Federal Judge Dismisses Gatlinburg Wildfire Lawsuits

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal judge has dismissed most components of a class-action lawsuit filed by families who lost loved ones in the 2016 Gatlinburg wildfires, as well as insurance companies who argued the National Park Service failed to adequately warn neighboring communities about the threat of the Chimney Tops 2 wildfire. The judge ruled that the park's decisions regarding when and how to warn the public represented protected discretionary judgments.

Why it matters

The Gatlinburg wildfires in 2016 were one of the deadliest natural disasters in Tennessee history, killing 14 people and causing over $2 billion in damage. The dismissal of these lawsuits leaves the affected families with limited legal recourse, raising questions about accountability and the scope of governmental liability in disaster response.

The details

The class-action lawsuit was filed by families who lost loved ones, as well as insurance companies, arguing the National Park Service failed to properly warn nearby communities about the growing threat of the Chimney Tops 2 wildfire. However, the federal judge ruled that the park's decisions on public warnings were protected under the discretionary function exception, meaning they were judgment calls not subject to legal liability.

• The Gatlinburg wildfires occurred in November 2016.
• The class-action lawsuit was filed in the years following the disaster.
• The federal judge's ruling dismissing most of the lawsuit was issued on April 1, 2026.

What’s next

The families who lost loved ones in the Gatlinburg wildfires may now pursue more limited legal options, such as appealing the judge's ruling or seeking legislative action, in their efforts to hold authorities accountable and obtain some form of compensation.