Kristi Noem Spent $20,000 on Horse Rental for Immigration Ad

List of known production costs for $220 million ad campaign released by Democratic senators

Mar. 24, 2026 at 8:05am

More than $200,000 in taxpayer money was used to produce an immigration advertisement featuring then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, including a $20,000 expense for horse rental. The list of costs, disclosed by Democratic senators, also included a $60,000 'signing bonus' for the production company, as well as expenses for hair, makeup, and other vendors.

Why it matters

The high costs of the ad campaign, which prominently featured a political figure, have raised concerns about the appropriate use of taxpayer funds for government advertising. The involvement of Noem's former aide and the production company's ties to the DHS spokesperson have also sparked questions about potential conflicts of interest.

The details

The list of expenses paid to the Strategy Group Company, the subcontractor tasked with producing the $220 million ad, included $107,405 in labor costs, a $60,000 'signing bonus', $52,599 for videography, photography, and production vendors, $20,000 for horse rental, $3,781 for hair and makeup services, $500 for a magic store, and $41,852 for other vendors. The total cost in taxpayer dollars was $286,137.

  • The ad campaign featuring Kristi Noem was produced in 2026.

The players

Kristi Noem

Former South Dakota Governor who appeared in the immigration advertisement as Homeland Security Secretary.

The Strategy Group Company

The subcontractor tasked with producing the $220 million ad campaign, whose chief executive is married to a former Department of Homeland Security spokesperson.

Corey Lewandowski

Former aide to Kristi Noem who has also worked with The Strategy Group Company.

Peter Welch

Democratic Senator and member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Richard Blumenthal

Democratic Senator and ranking member of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The Senate Judiciary Committee and Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations are expected to continue their inquiries into the ad campaign and the use of taxpayer funds.

The takeaway

This case highlights the need for greater transparency and oversight when it comes to government-funded advertising campaigns, especially those that feature political figures. It raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and the appropriate use of public resources for partisan purposes.