South Dakota Lawmakers Block 'Rights of a Parent' Measure

Bill raising concerns over healthcare, child abuse fails in state House

Published on Mar. 4, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A bill that would have codified parents' rights to 'direct the upbringing' and 'moral and religious training' of their children failed in the South Dakota House of Representatives this week. Lawmakers voted 35-30 to defeat the legislation, with opponents raising concerns about protecting abusive and neglectful parents and inadvertently criminalizing coaches and teachers.

Why it matters

The failed bill highlights the ongoing debate over the balance between parental rights and child welfare protections in South Dakota. Supporters argued the measure was needed to prevent government overreach, while opponents warned it could enable abuse and undermine mandatory reporting laws.

The details

The legislation, brought by Republican state Sen. Tamara Grove, passed the state Senate 19-15 last month. However, it faced strong opposition in the House, where lawmakers voted it down on Monday. A reconsideration attempt on Tuesday also failed. Supporters like Republican Rep. John Hughes argued the bill was necessary to prevent 'medicine and education' from 'dividing the child from the parents.' But opponents, including Republican Rep. Taylor Rehfeldt, raised concerns that the bill could override mandatory reporting requirements and enable abusive parents to conceal mistreatment. Another provision requiring consent for recording minors also drew criticism from lawmakers who said it could inadvertently impact teachers and coaches.

  • The state Senate passed the bill 19-15 last month.
  • Lawmakers voted 35-30 on Monday to defeat the bill in the House.
  • A reconsideration attempt in the House failed on Tuesday.

The players

Sen. Tamara Grove

The Republican state senator who introduced the 'rights of a parent' legislation.

Rep. John Hughes

A Republican state representative who supported the bill in the House, arguing it was needed to prevent government overreach in families.

Rep. Taylor Rehfeldt

A Republican state representative who opposed the bill, warning it could enable abusive parents and undermine mandatory reporting requirements.

Rep. John Shubeck

A Republican state representative who expressed concerns that the bill's provisions around recording minors could inadvertently impact teachers and coaches.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The problem today is that we have medicine and education that is postured to divide the child from the parents. I think it's time that we provide that the law requires otherwise.”

— Rep. John Hughes, Republican state representative (South Dakota Searchlight)

“If there's any doubt in any of our minds that this bill passage would enable a parent to put that abuse on their child, we can't pass it.”

— Rep. Taylor Rehfeldt, Republican state representative (South Dakota Searchlight)

“It just concerns me that well-meaning teachers will get in trouble. I like giving the parents the ability to monitor what their kids are being taught, I'm just concerned about myself and others getting inadvertently swept up into breaking the law.”

— Rep. John Shubeck, Republican state representative (South Dakota Searchlight)

What’s next

The failed bill is unlikely to be reconsidered further this legislative session, but the debate over parental rights and child welfare protections is expected to continue in South Dakota.

The takeaway

This failed legislation highlights the ongoing tensions in South Dakota over balancing parental autonomy and child safety. While supporters argued the bill was needed to prevent government overreach, opponents successfully blocked it over concerns it could enable abuse and undermine mandatory reporting laws.