South Carolina House Passes Bill Targeting Telehealth Abortion Pill Access

Some Republicans argued the legislation didn't go far enough in restricting access to abortion-inducing drugs.

Feb. 4, 2026 at 9:23pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The South Carolina House of Representatives approved a bill on Wednesday that aims to strengthen the state's existing ban on mailing drugs used to induce abortions. The legislation would reclassify the abortion-inducing drugs mifepristone and misoprostol as Schedule IV substances, making them more difficult to obtain. While proponents argued the bill would close a loophole, some Republicans said it didn't go far enough in restricting access, while Democrats warned it could endanger women's health by limiting access to the drugs for other medical purposes.

Why it matters

The bill is the latest effort by South Carolina's Republican-controlled legislature to further restrict abortion access in the state following the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The debate highlights the ongoing tensions between those seeking to limit abortion rights and those concerned about the broader implications of such measures on women's healthcare.

The details

The bill would make it illegal to hold a fundraiser or distribute money to purchase abortion-inducing drugs, and threatens up to life in prison for providing the pills to a pregnant woman without her knowledge. It also allows the family of a pregnant woman, including the biological father, grandparents, and siblings, to sue an out-of-state doctor or company that provides the drugs if they knew the pills were going to someone in South Carolina.

  • The House approved the legislation on Wednesday, February 4, 2026.
  • The bill now heads to the South Carolina Senate for consideration.

The players

Rep. Jay Jordan

A Florence Republican who said the bill "further demonstrates what has been the policy in South Carolina, which is anti-abortion."

Rep. Josiah Magnuson

A member of the ultra-conservative Freedom Caucus who argued the proposal doesn't do enough to actually prevent people from getting the abortion-inducing pills.

Rep. John McCravy

A Greenwood Republican who has long pushed for a ban on abortion from conception, and voted for the bill even though he wanted it to go further in restricting access to the drugs.

Rep. Spencer Wetmore

A Folly Beach Democrat who argued reclassifying the drugs would make it harder to get medication for other reasons, such as inducing labor or stopping heavy bleeding after childbirth.

Rep. Beth Bernstein

A Columbia Democrat who said the medications need to be readily accessible, as she had complications during her own delivery that required their use.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This is the closing of a loophole that further demonstrates what has been the policy in South Carolina, which is anti-abortion.”

— Rep. Jay Jordan, Florence Republican

“It doesn't save one life.”

— Rep. Josiah Magnuson, Member of the Freedom Caucus

“As someone who had difficulties during her delivery — significant issues that were considered life-threatening — these medications need to be readily accessible.”

— Rep. Beth Bernstein, Columbia Democrat

What’s next

The bill now heads to the South Carolina Senate for consideration, where further debate and potential amendments are expected.

The takeaway

This legislation reflects the ongoing battle over abortion rights in South Carolina, with Republicans seeking to further restrict access to abortion-inducing drugs and Democrats warning of the potential unintended consequences on women's healthcare. The debate highlights the complex and divisive nature of this issue in the state.