Wabtec, Progress Rail Settle Anti-Trust Lawsuit

Lawsuit alleged anti-competitive behavior after Wabtec’s acquisition of GE Transportation

Published on Mar. 2, 2026

Wabtec and Progress Rail, a unit of Caterpillar, have settled a lawsuit alleging that Wabtec engaged in anti-competitive measures following its $11 billion acquisition of GE Transportation in 2019. Progress Rail claimed the acquisition created a dominant market position in diesel-electric long-haul freight locomotives and components, and that Wabtec abused its power through exclusionary tactics such as restricting data flow, imposing costs on rivals, and making false statements about Progress Rail exiting the market.

Why it matters

This settlement resolves a high-profile anti-trust case in the rail industry, where consolidation and market dominance can have significant impacts on competition, innovation, and consumer prices. The outcome could set precedents for how regulators and courts view future mergers and acquisitions in the sector.

The details

Progress Rail, which manufactures the former General Motors line of motive power, alleged in the lawsuit that Wabtec’s actions after the GE Transportation acquisition harmed competition and consumers. The two companies have now settled the case, with no admission of liability. They acknowledged that they remain suppliers of long-haul freight locomotives and cab components to Class I railroads and other customers.

  • Wabtec acquired GE Transportation in 2019 for $11 billion.
  • Progress Rail filed the anti-trust lawsuit against Wabtec following the acquisition.

The players

Wabtec

A major manufacturer of rail equipment and components, based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Progress Rail

A unit of Caterpillar that manufactures the former General Motors line of motive power, based in Albertville, Alabama.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

The takeaway

This settlement highlights the ongoing scrutiny of consolidation and market dominance in the rail industry, where regulators and competitors are closely watching for any anti-competitive behavior that could harm innovation, choice, and consumer prices.