Philadelphia judge to examine slavery displays before ruling on President's House exhibit

The city of Philadelphia is suing the National Park Service over the removal of exhibits about slavery at Independence National Historical Park.

Jan. 30, 2026 at 5:07pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal judge will visit the site of the President's House exhibit in Philadelphia to examine the condition of the displays about slavery that were recently removed by the National Park Service. The city of Philadelphia has filed a lawsuit seeking to have the exhibits restored, arguing that the removal was an attempt to erase history. The National Park Service claims it has sole authority over the exhibit under a property agreement, but the judge has challenged that argument.

Why it matters

The President's House exhibit was meant to examine the paradox of slavery and freedom at the site where Presidents George Washington and John Adams lived, along with enslaved people. The removal of the displays has sparked outrage from community members and activists who see it as an attempt to downplay the history of slavery in America.

The details

The National Park Service removed the displays last week following a directive by President Trump, who ordered a review of interpretive content at national parks to ensure they tell the "full and accurate story of American history." The city of Philadelphia argues that the removal goes against the longtime collaboration between the city and the Park Service over the exhibit. Former city officials testified that the exhibit was an important way to tell the story of slavery at a historic site.

  • The President's House exhibit opened in 2010.
  • The displays were removed by National Park Service staff using crowbars and wrenches on January 22, 2026.
  • A federal court hearing was held on January 30, 2026, eight days after the displays were removed.

The players

Joyce Wilkerson

Worked for the city of Philadelphia in the early 2000s when the President's House project was first introduced.

Everett Gillison

Former city employee who worked under former Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter.

Michael Coard

Activist, attorney, and founding member of Avenging the Ancestors Coalition.

Cynthia Rufe

The federal judge presiding over the case.

Donald Trump

The former President who issued the directive to review interpretive content at national parks.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“You can stand in the President's House where Africans were enslaved and look across the street and see the Declaration of Independence, the Liberty Bell. This is the place where the story needs to be told.”

— Joyce Wilkerson, Former city of Philadelphia employee (cbsnews.com)

“There's a gut punch that happened just by one person deciding that they were going to do something. That's not the way we work, that's not the way the Park Service has ever worked under my tenure.”

— Everett Gillison, Former city of Philadelphia employee (cbsnews.com)

“I love the pushback from the judge. The judge was absolutely incredulous about the contractual argument and the independent, dictatorial authority of the president. It's looking great in that courtroom.”

— Michael Coard, Activist, attorney, and founding member of Avenging the Ancestors Coalition (cbsnews.com)

What’s next

The judge indicated she would likely make a ruling on the case next week, after visiting the site herself to examine the condition of the removed panels.

The takeaway

The dispute over the President's House exhibit highlights the ongoing debate over how to accurately and sensitively portray the history of slavery in America, especially at sites of national significance. The judge's skepticism of the government's arguments suggests the city of Philadelphia may prevail in its effort to have the slavery displays restored.