Congressman Smucker sues LNP over editorial

Lawsuit claims editorial defamed him and damaged his reputation

Feb. 3, 2026 at 7:55pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

U.S. Rep. Lloyd Smucker has filed a defamation lawsuit against LNP Media Group, the publisher of LNP — LancasterOnline, claiming an editorial printed on Oct. 8, 2025 damaged his reputation. Smucker is seeking more than $250,000 in damages, alleging the editorial "tended to harm (his) reputation by lowering him in the estimation of the community and deterring others from associating or dealing with him."

Why it matters

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing tension between public officials and the media, with Smucker claiming the editorial crossed the line into defamation while the newspaper stands by its right to express opinions on matters of public concern under the First Amendment.

The details

The Oct. 8 editorial said Smucker was "lying to his constituents" by claiming in a newsletter that Democrats were pushing for "taxpayer-funded free healthcare for illegal immigrants." LNP's earlier fact-check article said the Republican charge was an "exaggeration" and that the Democrats' proposal sought to restore benefits to non-citizens who are in the country legally. Smucker's suit contends that LNP published the editorial either despite knowing it was false or by "ignoring readily available materials that would have disproven the allegations."

  • The editorial was published on Oct. 8, 2025.
  • Smucker's attorney sent a letter demanding an apology and retraction on Oct. 9, 2025.
  • Smucker filed the defamation lawsuit on Feb. 4, 2026.

The players

Lloyd Smucker

A Republican U.S. Representative first elected in 2016, whose district includes Lancaster County and part of York County, Pennsylvania.

LNP Media Group Inc.

The publisher of LNP — LancasterOnline, the newspaper that printed the editorial Smucker is suing over.

Tom Murse

The editor of LNP — LancasterOnline.

Wally Zimolong

An attorney representing Congressman Smucker in the defamation lawsuit.

Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II

An attorney who wrote the October letter demanding an apology and retraction on behalf of Congressman Smucker.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The Oct. 8, 2025, editorial expressed an opinion on a matter of public concern, which is the purpose of editorials. Under the First Amendment, expressing opinions — including characterizing one side's positions as false — is protected speech and does not constitute defamation.”

— Tom Murse, Editor, LNP — LancasterOnline (LNP — LancasterOnline)

“When public officials threaten the press for expressing opinions about their official action, it can undermine the essential role of journalism and chill protected speech. A free, robust press is necessary to democracy, and journalists must be able to report without fear of retaliation.”

— Melissa Melewsky, Media law counsel, Pennsylvania NewsMedia Association (LNP — LancasterOnline)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide whether to allow the lawsuit to proceed or dismiss it based on First Amendment protections for the editorial.

The takeaway

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing tension between public officials and the media, with Congressman Smucker claiming the editorial crossed the line into defamation while the newspaper stands by its right to express opinions on matters of public concern. The outcome could have broader implications for press freedoms and the ability of public figures to challenge critical coverage.