Pennsylvania Counties Earn Millions Detaining Immigrants for ICE

Review finds counties billed federal government over $21 million to hold detainees in local jails

Apr. 7, 2026 at 1:46pm

A dimly lit county jail cell with bars casting long shadows, bathed in warm, diagonal sunlight, conveying a sense of quiet melancholy and the human toll of immigration detention.The lucrative practice of county jails detaining immigrants on behalf of federal authorities raises concerns about civil liberties and the incentives created by these financial arrangements.Harrisburg Today

A group of Pennsylvania counties have billed the federal government more than $21 million in recent years to detain immigrants in their local jails, according to a review by Spotlight PA. The practice has faced some pushback, but counties say they haven't experienced significant issues so far.

Why it matters

The use of county jails to detain immigrants on behalf of federal immigration authorities has raised concerns about the profitability of the arrangement and the potential for civil liberties violations. While counties argue it provides needed revenue, critics say it creates perverse incentives to criminalize immigrants.

The details

Spotlight PA's review found that several Pennsylvania counties have been billing the federal government to hold immigrants in their local jails on behalf of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The counties have received over $21 million in recent years through this arrangement, which allows them to profit from detaining immigrants who have not been convicted of crimes.

  • The review by Spotlight PA was conducted in 2026.

The players

Spotlight PA

A nonprofit news organization that conducted the review of Pennsylvania counties detaining immigrants for ICE.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

The takeaway

This practice highlights the complex issues surrounding immigration detention and the potential for conflicts of interest when local governments profit from holding immigrants who have not been convicted of crimes. It raises questions about the role of county jails, civil liberties, and the incentives created by these financial arrangements.