Pennsylvania House Passes Recreational Cannabis Bill, Awaits Senate Action

Bill faces opposition from some Republican senators who call it a "crazy plan"

Feb. 4, 2026 at 11:07pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Pennsylvania House of Representatives passed a bill last year to legalize and regulate adult-use cannabis, but the legislation has stalled in the Republican-controlled state Senate. House Democrats have renewed calls for their Senate colleagues to take up the bill, which would establish cannabis stores inside existing state-run liquor stores and expand the authority of the Liquor Control Board over cannabis products. However, some Republican senators have criticized the bill, calling it a "crazy plan" and expressing concerns about the potential impact on children.

Why it matters

Pennsylvania is one of the few remaining states in the Northeast that has not legalized recreational cannabis, putting it at a competitive disadvantage with neighboring states that have already done so. Legalizing cannabis could generate significant tax revenue for the state, but there are also concerns about the potential public health and safety implications.

The details

House Bill 1200, which would legalize and regulate adult-use cannabis in Pennsylvania, passed the state House last year by a narrow margin. However, the bill has since stalled in the Republican-controlled state Senate, with some GOP senators criticizing the proposal as a "crazy plan." The bill would establish cannabis stores inside existing state-run liquor stores and expand the authority of the Liquor Control Board over cannabis products. Supporters argue this would provide a level of control and regulation, while opponents worry it could lead to increased access and promotion of cannabis to children.

  • House Bill 1200 passed the Pennsylvania House in 2025.
  • The bill has been awaiting action in the state Senate since then.

The players

Jordan Harris

A Democratic state representative from Philadelphia who has called for the state Senate to take up the cannabis bill.

Josh Shapiro

The Democratic governor of Pennsylvania who has included a push to legalize cannabis in his annual budget address.

Joe Pittman

The Republican state Senate Majority Leader who has criticized the cannabis bill as a "crazy plan".

Rick Krajewski

A Democratic state representative from Philadelphia who has expressed concerns about the potential for corporate influence in a deregulated cannabis market.

Daniel Bartkowiak

A representative of the Pennsylvania Family Institute, a group that has advocated against legalizing cannabis in the state due to concerns about the impact on children.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The House has done its work in passing an adult-use cannabis bill over to the Senate, and we need our colleagues in the Senate to finally act on it.”

— Jordan Harris, Democratic state representative (abc27.com)

“When the House Democrats passed recreational marijuana last year, and they came up with that crazy plan to have the state stores implement it, we heard nothing from the governor on whether or not he'd even sign the bill.”

— Joe Pittman, Republican state Senate Majority Leader (abc27.com)

“Without proper control in place, we risk turning Pennsylvania into the new playground for corporate cannabis. We have the opportunity to reign in a market that is completely deregulated in terms of potency, content or labeling.”

— Rick Krajewski, Democratic state representative (abc27.com)

“When it comes to health care, when it comes to education, when it comes to law enforcement, when you increase access to these high-potency products, you're going to have costs.”

— Daniel Bartkowiak, Representative, Pennsylvania Family Institute (abc27.com)

What’s next

The state Senate will need to take up the cannabis bill passed by the House in order for it to move forward. The governor has indicated he would sign the bill if it reaches his desk.

The takeaway

The debate over legalizing recreational cannabis in Pennsylvania highlights the ongoing political tensions and concerns around the issue. While the House has acted, the bill faces an uncertain future in the state Senate, where some Republican lawmakers have expressed strong opposition. The outcome could have significant implications for the state's economy, public health, and criminal justice system.