- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Springfield Today
By the People, for the People
Peer-Led Crisis Response Teams Offer Better Approach to Mental Health Emergencies
CAHOOTS program in Oregon and similar models in San Francisco show how non-police teams can de-escalate crises without violence
Published on Feb. 18, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
This article discusses how specialized crisis response teams comprised of mental health professionals and peers with lived experience can more effectively and safely respond to mental health emergencies compared to traditional police response. The article highlights the success of the CAHOOTS program in Oregon and similar models in San Francisco, which have been able to de-escalate crises without the use of force in the vast majority of cases. The article argues that this approach should be more widely adopted to reduce police killings of individuals experiencing mental health crises.
Why it matters
Mental health crises are often met with a traditional police response, which can escalate situations and lead to tragic outcomes, including the use of deadly force. Peer-led crisis response teams offer a better alternative that is safer for everyone involved and has been shown to have better outcomes, including reduced hospitalizations and arrests. Expanding these types of programs could help prevent unnecessary deaths and improve community trust in crisis response.
The details
The article describes two contrasting incidents involving individuals experiencing mental health crises. In one case, a man named Jabez Chakraborty was shot four times by police after grabbing a knife, while in another case a man named Tyler was able to be de-escalated and given a ride home by a crisis response team in San Francisco without any use of force. The article argues that the vast majority of mental health crises do not actually warrant the use of deadly force, as research shows only 2.2% of such incidents result in serious injury. The article highlights the CAHOOTS program in Oregon, which has operated since 1989 using a two-person team of a medic and crisis worker to respond to mental health calls, with police backup needed in only about 2% of cases. The article also notes that peer-led crisis response teams, which include individuals with lived experience, have been shown to be more effective at building trust and understanding with those in crisis.
- The CAHOOTS program has operated in Eugene and Springfield, Oregon since 1989.
- A 2024 article reviewed 22 studies on first-episode psychosis, finding a 13.4% prevalence of 'any violence' and only a 2.2% chance of 'serious injury'.
The players
CAHOOTS
A crisis response program in Eugene and Springfield, Oregon that dispatches a two-person team of a medic and crisis worker to respond to mental health calls, with police backup needed in only about 2% of cases.
Jabez Chakraborty
A man experiencing a mental health crisis in New York City who was shot four times by police after grabbing a kitchen knife.
Tyler
A young Black man in San Francisco who was experiencing a mental health crisis and wielding a large knife, but was able to be de-escalated and given a ride home by a peer-led crisis response team without any use of force.
Vania Mendoza
A peer supervisor with San Francisco's crisis response team who recounted the incident with Tyler.
What’s next
Federal funding has recently been approved for programs like CAHOOTS, but substantial additional investments at the state and local levels will be needed to expand these types of peer-led crisis response teams to meet demand in many areas.
The takeaway
Peer-led crisis response teams that dispatch mental health professionals instead of police have been shown to be a more effective and humane approach to mental health emergencies, de-escalating crises without violence and providing better outcomes for those in need. Expanding these types of programs could help prevent unnecessary deaths and improve community trust in crisis response.


