Residents Questioned on Lack of Protest Over Alleged Abuses

The Nugget Newspaper editorial calls out community silence on various political controversies over the years.

Published on Feb. 10, 2026

An editorial in The Nugget Newspaper in Sisters, Oregon questions the lack of public protest from residents over a series of high-profile political scandals and controversies during recent presidential administrations, including allegations of sexual misconduct, impeachment, surveillance programs, border policies, and more. The editorial suggests the community has remained quiet regardless of which political party was in power.

Why it matters

The editorial raises concerns about civic engagement and the willingness of the Sisters community to hold leaders accountable across the political spectrum. It suggests a perceived indifference or partisan bias in how residents respond to alleged abuses of power and failures of government.

The details

The editorial cites a litany of political scandals and controversies from recent presidential administrations, including allegations of sexual misconduct, impeachment, surveillance programs, border policies, and more. It questions where the residents of Sisters were during these events, implying a lack of public protest or outcry regardless of which party was in power.

  • The editorial was published on February 11, 2026.

The players

Juanita Broaddrick

A woman who accused a former president of sexual assault.

Kathleen Willey

A woman who accused a former president of groping her.

Paula Jones

A woman who settled a sexual harassment lawsuit against a former president.

Brian Terry

A Border Patrol agent whose murder was linked to the Fast and Furious gun-walking scandal.

Edward Snowden

A former NSA contractor who revealed the agency's mass surveillance programs.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

The takeaway

This editorial highlights a perceived lack of civic engagement and willingness to hold leaders accountable across the political spectrum in the Sisters community. It suggests a partisan bias in how residents respond to alleged abuses of power, raising questions about the community's commitment to principles of good governance and democratic accountability.