Oregon Democrats Demand More Public Input on Massive Federal Logging Plans

Lawmakers request extended comment period and in-person meetings on proposal to dramatically increase logging in western Oregon forests

Mar. 30, 2026 at 8:50pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A photorealistic painting of an old-growth forest clearing with a fallen tree trunk in the foreground, the scene bathed in warm, diagonal sunlight and deep shadows, conveying a sense of quiet contemplation about the future of these protected lands.A serene forest scene belies the looming threat of expanded logging in Oregon's federal lands.Salem Today

Oregon's congressional Democrats are calling on the federal Bureau of Land Management to provide more public engagement and input opportunities regarding plans to significantly increase logging across millions of acres of federal forests in western Oregon. The lawmakers have requested a 60-day extension to the public comment period and at least one in-person meeting in each affected district, citing concerns from constituents about the environmental analysis and impacts of the proposed changes.

Why it matters

The federal government's plans to dramatically ramp up logging in western Oregon forests could have major ecological consequences, potentially threatening vulnerable species like the northern spotted owl and marbled murrelet that depend on old-growth habitats. The proposal also represents a significant shift away from decades of policies aimed at conservation and sustainable forestry practices on these public lands.

The details

In late February, the Bureau of Land Management announced it would revise the Western Oregon Resource Management Plans that have guided logging and conservation on 2.5 million acres of federal forests for decades. The agency's stated goal is to increase timber production to 'advance Trump administration priorities,' which could involve opening up areas currently protected from regular logging. However, the initial public comment period was only one month long, and no in-person public meetings were scheduled before the release of a draft proposal.

  • In late February 2026, the Bureau of Land Management announced plans to revise the Western Oregon Resource Management Plans.
  • The initial public comment period on the proposed changes ended on March 23, 2026.
  • A draft analysis of the environmental impacts is expected to be released in June 2026.

The players

Bureau of Land Management

The federal agency responsible for managing 2.5 million acres of forests in 17 counties in western Oregon, including the proposed changes to logging practices.

Jeff Merkley

U.S. Senator for Oregon and one of the Democratic lawmakers requesting more public engagement on the logging plans.

Ron Wyden

U.S. Senator for Oregon and one of the Democratic lawmakers requesting more public engagement on the logging plans.

Suzanne Bonamici

U.S. Representative for Oregon's 1st congressional district and one of the Democratic lawmakers requesting more public engagement on the logging plans.

Janelle Bynum

U.S. Representative for Oregon's 3rd congressional district and one of the Democratic lawmakers requesting more public engagement on the logging plans.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“More robust engagement at this stage will help ensure the agency does not overlook critical information necessary to reach a socially and legally acceptable decision.”

— Oregon Democratic Lawmakers

What’s next

The Bureau of Land Management has acknowledged receipt of the lawmakers' letter and is working on a response. A draft analysis of the environmental impacts of the proposed logging changes is expected to be released in June 2026.

The takeaway

The federal government's plans to dramatically increase logging in western Oregon forests have raised significant concerns among environmental advocates and local communities. The request by Oregon's Democratic congressional delegation for more public input and engagement on these plans reflects the high stakes involved and the need for a thorough, transparent process to assess the potential ecological and community impacts.