Federal Judge Limits Tear Gas Use at Portland ICE Protests

Ruling aims to address tensions between demonstrators and law enforcement over immigration policies and civil rights.

Published on Mar. 10, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal judge has ruled to restrict the use of tear gas by federal agents during protests outside the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) building in Portland, Oregon. The ruling, delivered on Friday, stems from a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of protesters challenging what they describe as excessive violence used by federal agents. The court's decision specifies that federal agents can only employ tear gas in "exigent circumstances" to prevent injury or significant property damage.

Why it matters

The ruling has sparked a debate over the balance between maintaining order and protecting the rights of citizens to protest peacefully. The protests, which have seen a mix of peaceful demonstrations and confrontations since last summer, are partly fueled by broader national controversies surrounding immigration enforcement and systemic racism.

The details

During the legal proceedings, Judge Marco Hernandez expressed concern about the potential harm caused by tear gas as a crowd control method, particularly in a community already grappling with various public health issues, including the COVID-19 pandemic. The ACLU has long advocated for more humane policing practices, and this ruling aligns with their ongoing efforts to promote civil liberties.

  • The ruling was delivered on Friday, March 10, 2026.

The players

Judge Marco Hernandez

The federal judge who delivered the ruling to restrict the use of tear gas by federal agents during protests outside the ICE building in Portland.

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)

The organization that filed the lawsuit on behalf of protesters challenging the excessive use of force by federal agents.

Jann Carson

The interim executive director of the ACLU of Oregon, who stated that the ruling is a crucial step in reaffirming the constitutional rights of individuals to protest without fear of excessive force.

Mia Rodriguez

A local activist who has participated in several ICE building protests and hailed the decision as a victory for peaceful protesters.

Ellen Rosenblum

The Attorney General of Oregon, who expressed support for the ruling and noted that the excessive use of tear gas by federal agents has escalated tensions and exacerbated the risk of violence.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This ruling is a crucial step in reaffirming the constitutional rights of individuals to protest without fear of excessive force.”

— Jann Carson, Interim Executive Director, ACLU of Oregon

“This is about ensuring that our voices are heard, not silenced by gas and violence.”

— Mia Rodriguez, Local Activist

“We need to find ways to de-escalate tensions rather than exacerbate them.”

— Ellen Rosenblum, Attorney General of Oregon

What’s next

The Department of Homeland Security and the ICE have not released official statements regarding how they intend to adapt their crowd control measures in light of the new court restrictions. The ongoing protests at the Portland ICE building are likely to continue, with activists asserting that they will not back down until substantive changes are made to immigration policy and law enforcement practices.

The takeaway

This ruling highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the balance between maintaining order and protecting the rights of citizens to protest peacefully. It reflects a growing call for reform in policing practices, not only in Oregon but across the United States, as communities grapple with issues of civil rights, immigration enforcement, and the use of force by federal law enforcement.