Oregon Lawmakers Pass Bill to Restructure Cash-Strapped Public Universities

Legislation orders state commission to find ways to improve financial situation amid declining enrollment and rising costs.

Mar. 12, 2026 at 9:34pm

Oregon lawmakers have passed a controversial bill aimed at addressing the financial challenges facing the state's public universities, which have experienced declining enrollment and consistent budget deficits over the past decade. The legislation orders the state's Higher Education Coordinating Commission to study the postsecondary education system and recommend opportunities for collaboration, restructuring, or integration to improve the universities' financial situation.

Why it matters

The bill comes as public universities in Oregon face 'fierce headwinds' due to declining enrollment and rising costs, leading some to require emergency bailouts from the state. Supporters argue the current decentralized structure has damaged collaboration and diminished the perception of college as a path to economic stability, while critics worry the recommendations could weaken access and undermine efficiency at rural-serving universities.

The details

The legislation, sponsored by Rep. Pam Marsh (D-Ashland), requires the Higher Education Coordinating Commission to study the state's postsecondary education system and offer recommendations for improvement by April 2027. A recent HECC report found that even as enrollment shrank, universities continued to add staff, putting upward pressure on tuition. The report also noted that universities have faced significant challenges with fixed costs and rising faculty and staff salaries and benefits, all while state funding for higher education in Oregon remains paltry.

  • The Oregon Legislature passed the bill before adjourning last week.
  • The HECC report analyzing university spending, enrollment, and staffing was released in January 2026.

The players

Rep. Pam Marsh

The Democratic state representative from Ashland, whose local university, Southern Oregon, required a $15 million bailout this year to meet cash flow needs, is the chief sponsor of the legislation.

Charles Hofmann

The chair of Eastern Oregon University's board of trustees, who testified against the bill, voicing concerns that mandates could weaken access, destabilize operations, and undermine efficiencies at rural-serving universities.

Sen. Todd Nash

The Republican state senator from Enterprise, whose district includes Eastern Oregon University, the state's smallest public university, and who opposed the bill, worried the report would ignore the unique needs and priorities of regional universities.

Maureen Brakke

The executive director of marketing and communications at Western Oregon University, who argued that the state's minimal investment in higher education has led institutions to struggle, and that keeping tuition increases low may not be realistic without greater support from the state.

Tina Kotek

The governor of Oregon, who is expected to sign the bill into law.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“For rural-serving universities like ours, such mandates could weaken access, destabilize operations, and undermine the very efficiencies these recommendations seek to achieve.”

— Charles Hofmann, Chair of Eastern Oregon University's board of trustees

“They just don't want somebody else to come in, make a report, and then have action that is going to do something detrimental.”

— Sen. Todd Nash, Republican state senator from Enterprise

“Universities face significant challenges...all while current funding computations fail to consider rising wages and benefits.”

— Maureen Brakke, Executive director of marketing and communications at Western Oregon University

What’s next

Gov. Tina Kotek is expected to sign the bill into law in the coming weeks.

The takeaway

This legislation highlights the financial pressures facing Oregon's public universities, as declining enrollment, rising costs, and stagnant state funding have led to budget deficits and emergency measures. The proposed restructuring aims to improve collaboration and efficiency, but critics worry it could undermine access and stability, especially at smaller, rural-serving institutions.